Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Speed Me Up/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: No consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:08, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Unreliable sources, sources used in wrong sections, and lots of unsourced statements. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 06:52, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Beside the MOS:PLOT, I don't see unsourced statements. (CC) Tbhotch™ 07:48, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: I was told that MOS:PLOT doesn't apply however since it is not the main subject of the article. So, I've added sources to that section (and the unreliable source was already removed). However, the "sources used in wrong sections" part sounds questionable to me since...well, why can't it be used in other sections? ~ Tails Wx 12:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delist for now. There are still sources being used in the wrong places. For example, Apple Music should not be used to assign a genre for the song. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 08:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Taking a quick skim through the article, I am surprised at how little detail there is about the Background of the song's creation. There's also not much information about the song's composition (other than its lyrics). Are there sources that describe this information? Z1720 (talk) 14:28, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.