Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Non-constituency Member of Parliament/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:21, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Multiple paragraphs without citations. Z1720 (talk) 15:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have added citations and hid the uncited chunks. They might be from the books cited, but I will need time to check them through. But as for now, where it stands, the article remains in good shape.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 02:04, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Uncited statements have been removed. I hope the hidden text will be evaluated for inclusion later. Z1720 (talk) 02:09, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- When I re-wrote the article, I worked with the citations that were already there, which made things a lot easier. I didn’t have to start from scratch since most of the sources were already in place. Nevertheless, big thanks to ZKang123 for adding new citations to specific parts of the text. MordukhovichAleakin (talk) 04:04, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not going to !vote delist over this, but there seems a heavy reliance on primary sourcing for parts of this article which could be improved going forward. CMD (talk) 02:58, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.