Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/History of the University of Santo Tomas/1

History of the University of Santo Tomas

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: An editor has expressed interest in improving this, but has since went inactive more than a month ago. No work has been done since March. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 15:39, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are uncited statements, including the entire "Filipinization of the university" section and several paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for reminding, will update in the coming days. I hope youll give me a sufficient time to overhaul the article. just a bit busy. KingTiger1611 (talk) 17:27, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some temporary references to that section; please read the edit summary. Queen Douglas DC-3 (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added citation needed tags to the articles for the statements that need them. Z1720 (talk) 16:03, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Queen Douglas DC-3, KingTiger1611, and MultiJames95: do any of you intend to continue working on this article? No worries if not. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:09, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm won't be able to provide any more time to it. Queen Douglas DC-3 (talk) 13:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, while you're here, University of Valle may need a GA reassessment too. Queen Douglas DC-3 (talk) 13:24, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I will continue to rehash the whole article. I hope the editors would be able to provide me ample time to extensively overhaul the article. Many thanks! KingTiger1611 (talk) 02:55, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KingTiger1611, how much time do you think you need? Thanks, ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:38, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I hope Id be given a few months... but ill try to reorganize the article as soon as possible. Thank you! KingTiger1611 (talk) 15:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@KingTiger1611: The last edit to the article was in March. Are you still working on this, or is this ready for another review? Z1720 (talk) 18:52, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like @KingTiger1611 has been inactive since this comment. They meant it when they asked for "a few months". Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 17:47, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delist: Concerns remain, no edits to the article since March. Z1720 (talk) 18:21, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.