Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Heather Mills/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:56, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:42, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs.
- There are two paragraphs without citations in the lead - but it is normal for paragraphs in the lead to lack citations if they are summarising matter that is in the body of the article that is backed by citations.
- I have fixed the problems with the uncited paragraph in the "Divorce" section. It was obvious from the previous paragraph what the source was for the statements - I had to restore a couple of the quotations so they were quotations and thus findable by a word search - this did not change the meaning.
- "Regarding her career, the judge said:" (in the "Divorce" section) is not a paragraph in itself, it merely introduces the quotation.
- I have now fixed the unsourced paragraph in the "Commercial interests" section - that required some research.
- So, @Z1720: what are the statements that need a citation? -- Toddy1 (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Toddy1: I have added citation needed templates to the article. The lead still needs to be expanded. I also recommend that the block quotes in the "Divorce" section be shortened and use summary style. Z1720 (talk) 01:08, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.