Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests
Guild home | How to copy edit | Templates | Barnstars | Participants | Coordinators |
Requests | Drives | Blitzes | Mailing list | Newsletters |
Note: this page is automatically archived using YiFeiBot_2; completed requests are archived after 24 hours. Manual archiving is normally unnecessary. Please check and fix incorrect codes, missing timestamps, etc. For more information, please see the bot request page. – Baffle gab1978 (talk)
![]() | Cast your votes in the GOCE's election of coordinators! Coordinators will serve a six-month term from July 1. Voting closes on 31 June at 23:59 (UTC). Our week-long June blitz began on 15 June at 00:00 UTC and will end on 21 June at 23:59 UTC. Sign up now! |
Guild of Copy Editors |
---|
WP:GOCE WP:COPYEDITORS |
Copy edit requests |
Guild members |
Guild directory |
Project discussion |
There are 2,250 articles currently in the backlog |
You can help! View all articles that require copy editing |
Guild of Copy Editors' requests page
On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles. Instructions for requestersTo make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:
Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit. Please note:
Requests may be declined if the article is:
|
March 2025
[edit]I plan on nominating Terraria for FAC. I only want the "Development and release" and "Reception" sections to be copyedited and made more engaging. I suggest following the instructions at MOS:VG. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 13:34, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
April 2025
[edit]Someone please completely rewrite this article, just get it off my hands. Seems a bunch of high school students have copy-pasted their term end papers on it. LΞVIXIUS💬 20:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
I need clean-up work on prose and grammar to nominate this article on FAC in the future. Santi (talk) 01:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
For a future FAC. Many sentences need to be simplified/made less complex; prose should have more concision too Elias 🦗🐜 [Chat, they chattin', they chat] 08:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Would like to renominate for FAC after having withdrawn the 1st FAC due to issues with prose. Pamzeis (talk) 02:55, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
I'm planning on submitting this article for GA status, and then possibly FA status, but I believe a copy edit would benefit it. The plot and themes section may be a little redundant, so restructuring that would be great. Thank you :) Crystal Drawers (talk) 18:28, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
FAC (I think). Am planning on nominating this article for FA sometime in the future. Some help with CE would be appreciated. Spookyaki (talk) 21:15, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
May 2025
[edit]Ukrainian war documentary film for GAN. Reidgreg (talk) 22:12, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Small visual novel article with potential for GAN. There are not too many sources so it might easy to do.Tintor2 (talk) 23:21, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Please help me to meet the above artical to meet Wikipedia:Good article criteria certification En.saravanan (talk) 08:49, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am requesting a copy edit of the article of the film Employee of the Month that starred Dane Cook, Jessica Simpson and Dax Shepard, especially since the plot section needing to be trimmed. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 18:33, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
See Talk:Greensburg tornado, pretty self-explanatory as to why I'm submitting a request. Hoping to get to FA-quality sometime soon. — EF5 18:10, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
The article was previously copyedited for an attempted FAC. Because the FAC was not successful, I had a peer review. I made the changes in the peer review and in the article's GAN. Currently, this article is a good article, but I am seeking another copyedit on this article as this article is significantly different from the last time this was copyedited, and I anticipate to send this for PR and later another FAC. As of the date of this request, I have an outstanding PR for a different article, but I intend to ask for another PR for this article as soon as my outstanding PR for the other article is done. For details, see Talk:Ochaco Uraraka. Z. Patterson (talk) 20:58, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- The peer review for the other article is closed. The second peer review for this article is outstanding. Z. Patterson (talk) 02:27, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- This peer review is now done. This request is now for a potential WP:FAC. Z. Patterson (talk) 00:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am requesting a copy edit of the article Mayiladuthurai to meet wikipedia good artical standards. Thank you. En.saravanan (talk) 06:24, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Potential GA. DareshMohan (talk) 13:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Old GA that recently passed GAR, needs copyedit. Thanks, actuall7 (talk | contrib) 08:44, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Forgotten about FA from 2009, may run as TFA in September for its 20th anniversary. Needs a copy-edit.Harizotoh9 (talk) 22:57, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
It is possible to copy-edit Draft:The World After Gaza:A History, as it appears to have been moved to the draft page due to its promotional tone. GolsaGolsa (talk) 07:23, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Wanted this one to be copyedited after there were a lot of edits already sibce it became a GA. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 17:41, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Much of this article is in a conversational style and needs to be trimmed for clarity. Karst (talk) 09:32, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
The article is in need of in-depth copyediting for its flow and use of grammar. Thank you. OceanHok (talk) 10:17, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Requesting a copy edit for this Good article nominee (GAN). Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 04:15, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Recently promoted GA, hoping for a ce to get any errors me or the GAN reviewer missed Olliefant (she/her) 10:14, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
I recently got this to GA status and would like to nominate this to FAC soon. I would appreciate a copy edit in case the GA reviewer or I missed anything. Thanks in advance. – Epicgenius (talk) 04:44, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
For possible re-nomination for GA. GnocchiFan (talk) 12:46, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Potential GAN after recent revision.Tintor2 (talk) 17:16, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
An editor placed a copy-edit template on the article and left a statement with the following summary that the article is over-written. Please kindly clean-up the article, keep the important information and remove the overly written ones and then once the article is cleaned up and well-written, remove the template. Thank you. KhantWiki (talk) 18:06, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
June 2025
[edit]ACN and potential GAN. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:47, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Portuguese festivities for GAN. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 08:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
WP:DYK nom. --TheUzbek (talk) 10:38, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
WP:DYK nom. --TheUzbek (talk) 10:38, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Might need to be copyedited. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 16:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Failed an FAC, with apparent MOS & reference issues which multiple editors indicate need to be fixed. Can someone go through the article and references and ensure they are aligned with MOS? Thanks in advance! From the FAC: “Examples of MOS issues include unmarked postal abbreviations, repeated links, and missing alts. Examples of citation inconsistencies include whether newspapers are italicized, whether authors are listed last name or first name first, and whether ISSNs are included for periodicals.
” The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 01:12, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- @WeatherWriter: Most, if not all, of what you mention could, and should, be treated by the subject-matter editors. "[U]nmarked postal abbreviations" mean what? I see two-letter state abbreviations being linked; that should be enough. WP:OVERLINK should be consulted and links removed accordingly (this is a fairly short article, of ~800 words, as we measure such things). There shouldn't be much need for linking a particular prose term more than once (you might even consider cutting down on linking the state postal abbreviations in your table, such as "MS" and "AL"). Consistent formatting of references, as well as what detail they contain, and how punctuated, are not what copy editors concentrate on. Nowhere in your FAC quotation does it say "prose issues", which is a better sign that the guild should be called in. Dhtwiki (talk) 09:58, 5 June 2025 (UTC) (edited 10:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC))
I'm hoping to bring Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2008 TV series), a 3D animated series, to GA status, but I'm not confident in my copy editing. I'm not sure what should be trimmed or kept, or how to best organize the article as a whole, especially the "Production" and "Other media" sections, which I feel are a bit messy. Lililolol (talk) 21:38, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Independent film with potential for FA. Jon698 (talk) 04:28, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
FA from 2009 that has not run on the front page, and may run in October for the 20th anniversary of its release. Needs a copyedit. Harizotoh9 (talk) 19:28, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
For a future GAN, I feel like the Legal proceedings sections need work. 7kk (talk) 23:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Working —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 20:06, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Wanted to try getting this to FA but the FAC didn't work out. So I think having a copyedit will help it out in some capacity. GamerPro64 01:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
A recent GA that I think it is likely to become a FAC. A copyedit can be helpful. (CC) Tbhotch™ 19:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
An FA that I've made changes to. LittleJerry (talk) 15:52, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Seeking a copy edit ahead of a possible Good article nomination (GAN). Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 17:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Potential DYK and GA nom. --TheUzbek (talk) 08:18, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Translated from its Japanese entry, the article has passed AfC with a B-class and was promoted in DYK, but was quick failed for a GA because of "grammar problems", and the reviewer suggested me a copyedit request here. --Saimmx (talk) 12:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Partially done: I've corrected the obvious prose issues. For a final polish to really make the writing shine, you may want to wait for another reviewer, but this should be sufficient to not quickfail. 2001:8F8:172B:3F78:9DD7:CA08:8AA4:B88C (talk) 05:03, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for copyediting! I have not even consider some of usage when seeing your change. Saimmx (talk) 14:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
For potential FAC. Lazman321 (talk) 05:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
FAC: After 2+ years I am planning on nominating this for FA status, hopefully by end of 2025. I would appreciate if a copyeditor could: 1.) make things read clearer; especially in songs section and release/promotion and 2.) redo the critical reception in its entireity as I am generally bad at writing those and have become too jaded and/or cynical to do a good job. This, alongside any other CE'ing/feedback, is greatly appreciated. Any sources with a ProQuest ID are accessible via Wikipedia Library. // Chchcheckit (talk) 11:28, 22 June 2025 (UTC)