User talk:Zenomonoz

Women in Red March 2025

Women in Red | March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Artists+Activists | Women of the Arab World Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: March editathons around the world Celebrate Women 2025 office hour series Tip of the month: You can access the Wikipedia Library if you have made 500+ edits, and 6+ months editing, and 10+ edits in the last 30 days, and No active blocks Moving the needle: 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) 23 Dec 2024: 20.009% (2,041,741 bios, 408,531 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:54, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

References

Women in Red April 2025

Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336 Online events: New: Alphabet run G & H | Business Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements (Events facilitated by others): The European Destubathon – a stub improvement contest/editathon from 1–30 April 2025 Tip of the month: When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT. Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited, it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name. Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool) 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women) 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Jesus on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2025

Women in Red | May 2025, Vol 11, Issue 5, Nos. 326, 327, 337, 338 Online events: New: Revolutionary women | Alphabet run I & J Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements (events facilitated by others): WikiProject Women in Green - a Good Article editathon from 1-31 May 2025 Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,269 articles during this period! 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,061,363; 414,126 women) 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% (2,057,083 bios; 412,857 women) Tip of the month: Those of you who experience harassment while trying to create or improve articles about women are welcome to bring your problems to our attention on the Women in Red talk page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:23, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Richard Hanania article

Cool story, bro. That's all I have to say. I haven't been trolling or vandalizing at all, and my edits arguably fall under WP:NPOV. Not sure why you keep accusing me. Please stop. RationalWikian (talk) 16:57, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Citations: please don't give a page range; be specific

Hello and thank your for your contributions. Could you please give the specific page number when citing from a book? Citing a range of thirteen pages of a book like you did for your Marwell cites on Josef Mengele makes it difficult to verify that the content you added is supported by the source provided. I have corrected the Mengele citations. Thank you, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:18, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Diannaa – thanks, can I ask how you got specific page numbers? I have an ebook version which is missing the exact page numbers, so I had to use the index to get the range of pages where topics are discussed (hence I used 100-113 for the eye studies). I'm guessing you might have extra access to books as a copyright checker, so I may need to acquire a paperback if I can't find access online. Zenomonoz (talk) 21:31, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

I have an actual book here. I got it at the library. In addition to the page range problem, you got the page number wrong when you said page 116 in the section "Myths and rejected anecdotes"; there's nothing there about the material you were trying to cite; the content (including the quotations) is on page 115. Please don't do that any more, especially on a Good Article.

You can search for a copy in a library near you using WorldCat. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:58, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Diannaa yes I have refrained from doing further work until I get a copy with page numbers. I think the original 116 was either based upon index, or based upon the page on ebook reader (which can change according to font size). Anyway, in my opinion, the good article status is problematic today, but it probably wasn't at the time it was designated GA. That's okay though. The article includes too much hearsay from the 1985 mock trial in Israel, which were repeated by the journalist Posner without scrutiny (although the historian Robert Jay Lifton did a more serious account). Zenomonoz (talk) 00:36, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

I also appreciate your copy edits and minor adjustments, I'll follow your approach in future edits in terms of attributing to Marwell when needed (which I see you added in) as some of this is a subject of debate. Zenomonoz (talk) 00:40, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

It's not a good idea to rely too much on any one source. Unfortunately Marwell is the only book on the topic available in my area. We don't even have Posner & Ware any more. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:53, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

I agree about relying too much on one source. On the other hand, Marwell is an authority on Mengele, he spent years just focused on him. There haven't been many books with a careful forensic approach. Paul Weindling also has useful chapters on Mengele that I plan to use. Zenomonoz (talk) 03:05, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

There's several pages in Evans as well. I will look at it tomorrow. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 03:07, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi there

I can tell you and I are about to have a big fucking problem.

But after looking at your local and global block logs, I was just wondering, are you a white supremacist?

Don’t be bashful. Represent what you believe. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 18:57, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

What on earth. I have opened an ANI about your behavior because of this: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Seppi333 incivility/harassment Zenomonoz (talk) 22:23, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

cool. im pretty sure you have extremeist views. But we'll see soon enoguh. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 22:51, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Any other baseless accusations you would like to make while you are at it? Casting aspersions at me because I reverted you one time? Zenomonoz (talk) 23:00, 28 May 2025 (UTC)