Jump to content

User talk:Zdrada

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for your contributions to Sam Holland (recording and mixing engineer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 22:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Zdrada, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! CycloneYoris talk! 22:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Zdrada. Thank you for your work on Donald R. Hamann. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please expand, for instance with an info ox scientist.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 11:19, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Zdrada. Thank you for your work on Masaki Takata. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

he is nitab.e, but the page needs a little work. Please add sources which are more independent. Currently they are all too closely associated with him. Also, please try and find a way to cite his publication record better as it is strong. I will also suggest adding a picture of him to the infobox.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 12:05, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Zdrada. Thank you for your work on Masaki Takata. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

You have added sources that do not validate the states. That is highly inappropriate.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 18:45, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Costas Stoumpos moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Costas Stoumpos. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster talk 03:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Henry I. Smith moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Henry I. Smith. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster talk 03:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Zdrada. Thank you for your work on Dan W. Urry. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please add sources for his awards, that is very important.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 13:18, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Masaki Takata moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Masaki Takata. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 09:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Zdrada. Thank you for your work on Nicoleta Nedelcu. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

@Zdrada, you have created enough BKPs of notable scientists that you should know that she is far from meeting any of the WP:NPROF criteria. WP:TOOSOON by many years.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 04:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. Yes as you may have noticed I am interested in such topics and I thought that the National Academy of Sciences prize gives an opportunity to match WP:NACADEMIC.
I'll try to do some more googling and rewrite the article. Zdrada (talk) 09:19, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nicoleta Nedelcu moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Nicoleta Nedelcu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is not close to meeting academic notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 04:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry I. Smith has been accepted

[edit]
Henry I. Smith, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 22:47, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nicoleta Nedelcu has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicoleta Nedelcu. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 17:47, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Zdrada. Thank you for your work on Veljko Radeka. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for adding this page for Radeka, with notability established through the set of awards and regonition through professional socities, including the IEEE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Award. When recreating articles, remember that you can re-use references by naming them; linking through Wikidata can also help to link the page to other resources (like Scopus).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 17:54, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Zdrada. Thank you for your work on Ian Eisenman. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for adding this biography; meets WP:NPROF. When creating pages, its helpful to link them to Wikidata where a page already exists (as was the case here). Biographical details are rather sparse, so there is certainly room for expansion.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 00:40, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your support and help. I will be more careful in the future. Zdrada (talk) 09:48, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Zdrada. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sam Holland (recording and mixing engineer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Costas Stoumpos (February 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 15:36, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Zdrada! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 15:36, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Edmond A. Grin
added a link pointing to Los Altos
Liu Qingfeng
added a link pointing to Tongcheng
Marion E. Ensminger
added a link pointing to Clovis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

[edit]

Hi there, Zdrada, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created your first women's biography and hope there will be many more. You might find it useful to look through our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 16:32, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zdrada. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sam Holland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 23:23, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Masaki Takata (March 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Flat Out (talk) 23:37, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336


Online events:

Announcements (Events facilitated by others):

Tip of the month:

  • When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT.
    Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited,
    it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name.

Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool)

  • 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women)
  • 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women)

Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period!

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red May 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | May 2025, Vol 11, Issue 5, Nos. 326, 327, 337, 338


Online events:

Announcements (events facilitated by others):

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,269 articles during this period!
  • 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,061,363; 414,126 women)
  • 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% (2,057,083 bios; 412,857 women)

Tip of the month:

  • Those of you who experience harassment while trying to create or improve articles about women
    are welcome to bring your problems to our attention on the Women in Red talk page.

Other ways to participate:

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:23, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

May 2025

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 20:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zdrada (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please explain what was happened? Maby you dont like my work in the field of wikipedia or something elthe? Who is sumbldlbn?

Decline reason:

What exactly is your connection to the articles you've been writing? We have evidence you've been violating WP:PAID and WP:COI and need to specifically address this. Yamla (talk) 10:14, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.