User talk:Tahanido

This is Tahanido's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Almodóvar del Río (1091) has been accepted

Battle of Almodóvar del Río (1091), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LR.127 (talk) 03:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tahanido! I accepted your article just now, and the article can still be improved! If you could improve the lead section on your article, following the guidelines in MOS:LEAD, that would be great!

Most important in the guidelines are this:

"It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies".

Happy editing! LR.127 (talk) 03:17, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @LR.127,

I just wanted to thank you for accepting my article "Battle of Almodóvar del Río (1091)" and for your advice on improving the lead section. I will follow your recommendations to enhance the article. Thanks again for your help and encouragement! Tahanido (talk) 12:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Merinid campaign of Andalusia (1277-1278) has been accepted

Merinid campaign of Andalusia (1277-1278), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 13:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @OhHaiMark

thank you for accepting my article Tahanido (talk) 14:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Lleida (1122-1123) has been accepted

Siege of Lleida (1122-1123), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dr vulpes (Talk) 22:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Dr vulpes

thank you for accepting my article Tahanido (talk) 11:12, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raid of Lisbon (1189) has been accepted

Raid of Lisbon (1189), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 13:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Almohad conquest of Evora (1191) has been accepted

Almohad conquest of Evora (1191), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 20:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Almohad conquest of Evora (1191) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Almohad conquest of Evora (1191) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Almohad conquest of Evora (1191) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

September 2024

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Almohad conquest of Evora (1191), you may be blocked from editing. Golikom (talk) 08:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is finished lol why will i be blocked from editing? Tahanido (talk) 11:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tahanido. The discussion is not over, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Almohad conquest of Evora (1191). RobertJohnson35 (talk) 21:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

look at the discussion page on the article he didn't answer. Tahanido (talk) 23:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfD discussions will almost always run at least a week. No single editor must respond to you in particular for it to continue. If you prematurely remove an AfD templates again, you will be blocked from editing. I recommend reading this for more information. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

lol he didnt answer for 3 days Tahanido (talk) 14:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Golikom. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Second Battle of Cirta, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Golikom (talk) 16:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:VICTOHH1 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/بوكوس. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 18:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

first i have any relation with the bocchus sockpuppets

second im not a suckpuppet Tahanido (talk) 10:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy Tahanido (talk) 11:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an unblock request so I don't think you'll get a response. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tahanido (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my behavior may have appeared suspicious, but I want to clarify that I am not a sockpuppet and have no connection whatsoever with the accounts I was suspected of being related to. This was a misunderstanding. I was blocked for one year, and during that time, I have reflected on the importance of following Wikipedia’s guidelines. I am now ready to contribute constructively and respectfully. I promise not to cause any further issues and will fully respect the community’s rules. Please consider unblocking me.

Decline reason:

I find it impossible to believe you are unconnected to Taha.12t given the username and the previously confirmed sockpuppetry. It's not actually clear to me this is what you are claiming, though. I mean, it's what your unblock request very specifically claims, but it may not have been your intent. Yamla (talk) 18:14, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tahanido (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am indeed the person behind the account en:User:Taha.12t, but I never used that account to edit or contribute — I created it, but then lost access to it and never logged in again. I'm genuinely sorry for the confusion and I now understand how this could be seen as sockpuppetry. I take full responsibility and want to reassure the community that I have no intention of breaking any Wikipedia rules. I would like a fresh start and promise to follow all policies carefully going forward. @yamla Thank you for your time and consideration.

Decline reason:

No response to asilvering's question. Please plan to answer all questions when filing a future unblock. Star Mississippi 15:11, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What about Gofté2.0? -- asilvering (talk) 05:39, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]