User talk:Surabhi9191

Welcome!

Hi Surabhi9191! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! JarrahTree 12:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Surabhi9191! Your additions to U.S. International Development Finance Corporation have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 13:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will keep that in mind. Surabhi9191 (talk) 14:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please confirm if the issue was Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing regarding my edit that was removed. So, that I can re-edit the information. I just need clarity to fix my mistake. Waiting for your reply. Surabhi9191 (talk) 14:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Keep up the good work Surabhi, happy editing!!

Garuda ^Talk! 15:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Surabhi9191 (talk) 15:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your expertise

Hey Surabhi, may I ask you to expand Planetary Parade? You don't need to do it right away—feel free to refuse if you're busy. Best, – Garuda ^Talk! 01:15, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for asking. When high-quality explanatory sources are easily accessible, I'll endeavor to expand it. Surabhi9191 (talk) 07:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, I'd add up more sources. – Garuda ^Talk! 08:19, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Artificial intelligence in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rajiv Gandhi government. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NavIC

Hey @Surabhi9191 I would like you to not to edit NavIC page because you don't cite accurate infos. As of now only 4 NavIC satellites are operational and others have experienced Atomic clocks failure. And please don't add 10 Yeats old reports Arjun8027 (talk) 14:14, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying. For clarity, in the remarks section, could you please include the sources for partial failures of IRNSS-1C, IRNSS-1D, IRNSS-1E, and IRNSS-1G. Similar to how it is mentioned for IRNSS-1A and NVS-02. Because, wiki pages of IRNSS-1C, IRNSS-1D, IRNSS-1E, and IRNSS-1G doesn't mention any failures. I removed the Partial Failure Status after unable to find sources that specifically talks about the partial failure of those satellites. Even for atomic clock failure, there is no mention of the above satellites other than IRNSS-1A.

I only found this article from the Indian Express which talks about atomic clock failure but doesn't clearly mention the name of other satellites, apart from IRNSS-1A. https://indianexpress.com/article/technology/science/failing-clocks-in-space-worry-for-indias-gps-4721918/ Surabhi9191 (talk) 14:48, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://imgur.com/a/rti-replies-17-december-2022-1z7fz4z

In this RTI reply you can find ISRO saying only 4 satellites are operational and ISRO chairman himself confirmed that in a recent pressmeet. Arjun8027 (talk) 15:06, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sharing the link. I can see that IRNSS-1B, IRNSS-1C, IRNSS-1F and IRNSS-1I are providing PNT services. While in the tabulation, the status of all the mentioned satellites are showing as operational. But IRNSS-1C is denoted as partial failure. Can you please share the source mentioning problem in IRNSS-1C. RTI reply matches this article https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/health-of-irnss-1c-spacecraft-normal-says-isro/articleshow/45297958.cms?from=mdr which I previously edited.

Also, is it possible to add the RTI reply link in the 'Remarks' section of the tabulation for reader's clarity. My reason for the edit was not to spam but add citation in the remark section regarding the partial failure as mentioned clearly for IRNSS-1A and NVS-02.

P.S. Since, I failed to get the sources mentioning partial failures, hence previously I changed the status as operational. Surabhi9191 (talk) 15:51, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khagantak has been accepted

Khagantak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:27, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @SafariScribe. Surabhi9191 (talk) 13:40, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhargavastra (counter drone system) has been accepted

Bhargavastra (counter drone system), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rahmatula786 (talk) 08:19, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Rahmatula786. Surabhi9191 (talk) 11:50, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahmatula786 Since I'm not sure how to merge wiki pages, could you kindly assist me with this? Both Bhargavastra (counter drone system) and Bhargavastra micro-missile system are on same topic. Surabhi9191 (talk) 13:49, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nagastra-1 has been accepted

Nagastra-1, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rahmatula786 (talk) 05:46, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Rahmatula786. Surabhi9191 (talk) 07:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rudrastra has been accepted

Rudrastra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rambley (talk) 08:58, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Rambley. Surabhi9191 (talk) 10:38, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kruti (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TarnishedPath was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kruti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TarnishedPath^talk 09:59, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Surabhi9191! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TarnishedPath^talk 09:59, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kruti has been accepted

Kruti, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeWake (talk) 07:42, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @WeWake. Surabhi9191 (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for creating an article, List of Indian military radars

I was thinking of creating an article listing India's military grade radars (mostly developed by India's DRDO), on the lines of the rather recently created List of Indian military missiles and List of active Indian military aircraft. This was because of the fact that many of the radars India developed does not have its article yet and it is being confusing as to where the details of those radars be included.

For example, Details of Ashwini LLTR radar by LRDE was included in List of equipment of the Indian Army until recently (I removed it since the radar is for the IAF not IA), it has been included in IACCS and, interestingly, is also present in Projects of DRDO#Navy (which is incorrect and confusing and lists all DRDO radars irrespective of whether or not they were meant for the service's use).

Initially, I want to include India's indigenous radars only which can and will be expanded to include all of active military radars irrespective of their origin. This way we can also reduce the load on the Projects of DRDO#Radars section. I have also raised the matter with other users including AbhijnanGhosh87, Shashpant and 4-RAZOR 01.

I am here to collect suggestions on the construction of the article and what certain categories to include there. Thanks, Aviator Jr (talk) 11:29, 7 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

@Aviator Jr Thank you for asking. I agree with you. I think a more comprehensive list that includes all radars (Indian public, private) rather than just DRDO radars. Only for foreign origin radars, include those names which are/were in use. Technical specs for many Indian radars are difficult to locate online compare to Western radars. Mostly found on forums where I'm not sure if they should be listed as sources on Wikipedia. Therefore, putting technical tabulation can be challenging. I would ask you to see what other wiki editors have to say. Surabhi9191 (talk) 12:54, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. As of now, I have a rough list of the radars (only military, not civilians). After I publish the article, you are free to add on civilian ones if you have the data. Aviator Jr (talk) 16:32, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviator Jr All right. Kindly go ahead and publish the article. I'll add on new information I get on radars later. Surabhi9191 (talk) 16:51, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Same here, will research on civilian aviation assets and public systems. AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 19:10, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page, List of Indian military radars, has been published. Aviator Jr (talk) 11:25, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Great work @Aviator Jr. Surabhi9191 (talk) 15:21, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great work @Aviator Jr AbhijnanGhosh87 (talk) 19:07, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you add article for Krutrim AI by Ola

I would like to suggest if you have added Kruti then better to add Krutrim article also, it's just a suggestion if you like to 2406:7400:51:7F1D:7C0C:DEEC:75F7:CEE0 (talk) 15:48, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestion. When there is sufficient information available, I intend to write an article about Krutrim AI. Surabhi9191 (talk) 18:02, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:ET-LDHCM has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:ET-LDHCM. Thanks! João^hola 22:15, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will rewrite the introductory section. Surabhi9191 (talk) 06:00, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ET-LDHCM has been accepted

ET-LDHCM, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

João^hola 07:16, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. Surabhi9191 (talk) 07:40, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ULPGM (missile) has been accepted

ULPGM (missile), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 13:33, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Surabhi9191 (talk) 16:09, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image Suggestion

Hey! I noticed the new article created on ULPGM (missile). A suggestion is that if images of the missile are available on Wikimedia Commons, adding one could improve the article visually and provide helpful context for readers. Thanks :)) Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 17:17, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JesusisGreat7 Thank you for the feedback. There is only one image available, but it does not show the missile separately. I'll include that in the article. Please see if it's alright. Surabhi9191 (talk) 17:42, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Surabhi9191, just added an image to the infobox. Happy editing! Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 05:04, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JesusisGreat7 Thank you for the infobox image. Surabhi9191 (talk) 07:10, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JesusisGreat7 Hi there once more! The image of the ULPGM has been flagged for copyright infringement. Could you please look into and resolve the license issue? Thank you. Surabhi9191 (talk) 07:22, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]