Jump to content

User talk:Sunhighway27

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Sunhighway27! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 19:37, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay Sunhighway27 (talk) 19:39, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

can you help me

[edit]

I need help with finding sorces on my articles for Draft:Fourmile Corner and Draft:Greenstreet Sunhighway27 (talk) 19:42, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]


invitation through AfC]]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sunhighway27 (talk) 18:29, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sunhighway27 (talk) 00:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sunhighway27 (talk) 00:38, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fourmile Corner (June 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Next time, consider checking if subjects you're writing on has enough notability before starting drafts.
AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 03:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
there are worse articles on wikipedia, EX: Goodhope, Missouri Sunhighway27 (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 12:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I know, I try. But why was it capitalized so much Sunhighway27 (talk) 00:55, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's a shortcut. You capitalize things like USA to shorten United States of America, this one is no different. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 01:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
sorry for misunderstanding Sunhighway27 (talk) 01:28, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We have an article on both Krakow and it is an unincorporated community too. So, we should have an article on this too. Sunhighway27 (talk) 01:23, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
too(*in the area).So Sunhighway27 (talk) 01:24, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
why, that was my good article of the two!! Sunhighway27 (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sunhighway27 (talk) 11:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fourmile Corner (June 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Enough already.
AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 12:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are less prominent communities that have articles on Wikipedia. I don't want war, I asked the Teahouse Sunhighway27 (talk) 12:35, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please, just give up and find something else that is notable to write about. I am open to helping you on a different draft when you have one. Stop dragging me here over a non-notable place and ignoring what I'm telling you. I can't write an advice when you're ignoring it. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 13:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am not ignoring you @AlphaBetaGamma Sunhighway27 (talk) 21:40, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have to finish the articles first Sunhighway27 (talk) 12:13, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If it isn't notable how is it on wikipedia's own maps. Sunhighway27 (talk) 18:42, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I live in the area Sunhighway27 (talk) 18:46, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 12:33, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

please no, I trying to fix the article, and having it blocked lowers my moral. So, can you unblock it so I can edit in peace, and when I finish you can decide if it is good enough Sunhighway27 (talk) 20:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I want to tell you something: if a draft is rejected, it is rejected. Trying to resubmit without sdding sources that actually have WP:SIGCOV is considered disruptive editing and will lead to you being WP:BLOCKed from editing. Just take your time finding the sources and add them to the articles. But I am worried though because it is a hard rejection and it cannot be resubmitted again. ToadetteEdit (talk) 13:29, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ok Sunhighway27 (talk) 18:17, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
did you mean adding Sunhighway27 (talk) 18:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you need to add the sources with significant coverage. ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:41, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
okay, Sunhighway27 (talk) 18:46, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Airpaz. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. .

Don't mess with AfC templates or add fake templates. bonadea contributions talk 07:52, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello Sunhighway27! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Sources and improving, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is your final decision

[edit]

Is the Greenstreet draft ready? @ToadetteEdit Sunhighway27 (talk) 12:42, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned by the sources so the draft is not ready. I will not decline/reject it, but expect this draft to be declined soon. From looking at the list of the sources, this is a general page about the town without discussing it further, this should never be used as it is user-generated, this also should never be used, this ditto, and the very last one is some real estate listing so it should not be used as well. Which leaves us with one sourcescwhich I did not check but it I'd clearly not enough. ToadetteEdit (talk) 12:53, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
the first link doesn't work for me Sunhighway27 (talk) 13:17, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The property is about how old the homes are and the sorces clearly and realible says that so I will not get rid of it. Sunhighway27 (talk) 13:19, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
the source that you are referring to relates to the properties of that road, but it does not discuss about the main topic itself significantly. And I do not see any references to the properties' ages. ToadetteEdit (talk) 16:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
""Greenstreet Rd in Beaufort is comprised of 42 properties. The average property size for homes on Greenstreet Rd is approximately 1161 square feet, accommodating both cozy and more spacious living arrangements. Residential properties on Greenstreet Rd in Beaufort typically sell at an average price of $162,253, reflecting the street's desirable location and community amenities. With the average property being built around 1963, residents enjoy a mix of modern features and classic charm. Sunhighway27 (talk) 01:23, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Still, it is about the properties and not about the road itself. ToadetteEdit (talk) 06:21, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Greenstreet Road is the main Road for greenstreet Sunhighway27 (talk) 11:31, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ideally, you should not be writing about small, obscure streets and roads sitting in the middle of a mostly empty area. Wikipedia does not need every road possible, except if the road has exceptional history that is documented significantly in reliable sources or otherwise meet the general notability guidelines. Greenstreet is just an ordinary road that is mentioned in perhaps a few pages, but not significantly. And Google Maps should not be used on Wikipedia as a reference. ToadetteEdit (talk) 12:04, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't use google maps Sunny's Highway 27 13:59, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
while you are in the area can you check Fourmile Corner too? @ToadetteEdit Sunhighway27 (talk) 01:38, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I look at the reference list, and I can tell that three of them do not establish notability (inclusion of Apple Maps). I can't access the second source, but it appears to support the claim of the subject existence. And I doubt the fourth source. That said, I can't tell if this is enough to show off notability.
As far as it goes, you can move the drafts to the mainspace, but I strongly discourage you to do so unless you are absolutely sure that you address the notability related concerns. ToadetteEdit (talk) 10:38, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed more, but how would I move it though? Sunhighway27 (talk) 13:25, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I did it 2600:387:F:7C1A:0:0:0:9 (talk) 17:43, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
sorry that was me when I was logged out Sunny's Highway 27 11:24, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
what else am I going to do for how far away other communities are. Sunhighway27 (talk) 13:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
nevermind that doesn't need a sorce Sunhighway27 (talk) 13:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay did some more work Sunhighway27 (talk) 01:30, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links to draft articles in actual articles, as you did to Boone Township, Franklin County, Missouri. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry Sunhighway27 (talk) 01:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greenstreet, Missouri moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Greenstreet, Missouri. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and You've disclosed a COI; you need to use the AfC process. See WP:COIEDIT. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:24, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

C'mon, dude. You have moved this page to mainspace only for it to be draftified. I strongly discouraged you to move the page unless you are absolutely sure that it will meet the notability guidelines and that all concerns are addressed. Now, if you do it again without being absolutely sure, it might face deletion. ToadetteEdit (talk) 16:58, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
sorry they wanted more sources Sunny's Highway 27 20:19, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
how many more sources Sunny's Highway 27 11:48, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
See User:Curb Safe Charmer/Three Best Sources. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:45, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I looked Sunny's Highway 27 20:10, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And I fixed more Sunny's Highway 27 20:10, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Curb Safe Charmer, I resubitted it and added an more citations template Sunny's Highway 27 22:18, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frootbat

[edit]
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sunny's Highway 27 20:56, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frootbat (June 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Resubmitted without any improvement
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 21:41, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sunhighway27! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 21:41, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't move an article that's being discussed in AfD

[edit]

Please stop moving Greenstreet, Missouri to draftspace. If the AfD discussion should end with a consensus to draftify, it can be moved back, but articles should not be moved while an AfD discussion is ongoing. --bonadea contributions talk 20:33, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry Sunny's Highway 27 20:35, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. When the article is moved to draftspace, then moved to mainspace, you cannot move back to draftspace. When a deletion discussion is ongoing, you may not move the page, either in the draftspace or userspace or in any title. You can simply vote to userfy or draftified in the AfD page. ToadetteEdit (talk) 04:55, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fourmile Corner, Missouri (June 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cinder painter was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cinder painter (talk) 05:09, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025 (2)

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia.

Draft:Fourmile Corner has been rejected. It was disruptive and a waste of other people's time for you to create an identical draft at Draft:Fourmile Corner, Missouri, and it was seriously inappropriate to then tag the original draft for deletion to try to trick the reviewers into thinking this was a new draft. Stop it. --bonadea contributions talk 06:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no I accidently moved it to a user page then couldn't get it back, so I had to make a new one Sunny's Highway 27 11:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Bonadea Sunny's Highway 27 20:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not quite sure why you pinged me – I'm afraid your response to my question does not quite make sense. Moving a page requires at least a couple of clicks, it's not something you can do by mistake. You did not have to create a new draft page – quite the reverse. And there is no way you can have copied and pasted the draft without the previous AfC templates by mistake, or that you accidentally submitted it for review. --bonadea contributions talk 20:28, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, I only accidently turned to a user page, then on purpose to make a new draft Sunny's Highway 27 21:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. You created a new draft on purpose, like I said. That was disruptive. When a draft is rejected, you may not create it under a new title, without the decline and rejection templates, and submit it. --bonadea contributions talk 07:37, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
think next time Sunny's Highway 27 21:25, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Other people's user pages

[edit]

Please do not create user pages for other editors, as you did here and here. It is up to every user whether to create a user page or not. Thanks, --bonadea contributions talk 06:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it was empty Sunny's Highway 27 10:52, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So? It's up to the user to decide if they want a user page. And one of the user pages you created belongs to a user who has made no edits. Please do not create user pages for any other editors. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 14:28, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just to link to them better Sunny's Highway 27 14:29, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ok Sunny's Highway 27 14:30, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sunhighway27&oldid=1297491064"