User talk:Razgura

Welcome!

Hi Razgura! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 06:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from fa:آرش_زره‌تن_لهونی to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

. Razgura (talk) 08:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from fa:در_آغوش_درخت to Dar Aghooshe Derakht. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:03, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But I wrote in the edit summary! Razgura (talk) 08:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from fa:طوبی_(مجموعه_تلویزیونی) to Tooba (TV series). While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Abbas Nilforoushan

On 3 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Abbas Nilforoushan, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 21:51, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ibrahim Amin al-Sayyed

Thank you for your interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption, a special set of rules apply to anyone editing in this topic area. Specifically, only extended confirmed editors are allowed to make direct edits and page creations to this topic area. Since you currently do not meet the requirements to contribute to this topic area, the page you created has been nominated for speedy deletion under G5.

If you think this page does not fall under the general sanctions described, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally you may wish to read about the topic restrictions here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Breakfast with Giraffes moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Breakfast with Giraffes. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK Razgura (talk) 06:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saeed Khani (producer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Saeed Khani (producer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Camilear (talk) 13:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK Razgura (talk) 18:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mehrdad New York moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mehrdad New York. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:10, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mahyar Ayyar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mahyar Ayyar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 09:11, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1952 DC-3 Plane Crash in Iran moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 1952 DC-3 Plane Crash in Iran. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and more inline citations as there are numerous unsourced paragraphs and sections. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 18:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iran: Allegations of manipulated economic data moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Iran: Allegations of manipulated economic data. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it reads like an essay rather than an encyclopedia article. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 16:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Razgura. Thank you for your work on Tehran water shortage inequality. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work. Probably needs a title change to "Tehran water shortage" which is what the overall article is about

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air pollution in Iran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SO2. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Funding of the Axis of Resistance

Thank you for your interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption, a special set of rules apply to anyone editing in this topic area. Specifically, only extended confirmed editors are allowed to make direct edits and page creations to this topic area. Since you currently do not meet the requirements to contribute to this topic area, the page you created has been nominated for speedy deletion under G5.

If you think this page does not fall under the general sanctions described, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally you may wish to read about the topic restrictions here.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran

Hi there! Like I said in the AfD, I wanted to leave some suggestions for improving Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran. I think you've done good work on the article so far and obviously you should take all of my suggestions with a grain of salt, but since you asked for feedback I wanted to leave some ideas that you might find helpful.

My main concern is there are a few sections in the article where I don't really understand what the “allegations of manipulated economic data" being referenced are, particularly the sections on defence and academic degrees. And there are still several places where you seem to make your own accusations of data manipulation by placing statistics alongside each other (see WP:OR, WP:SYNTH). So I think the main thing you need to do is to stick much more closely to what is actually said in reliable secondary sources. What precise allegations of manipulated economic data have been made? Who has made each allegation, and what is their evidence? You also need to consider the importance of maintaining a neutral point of view. Does Iran deny the allegations? What do reliable sources say about the credibility of the claims?

I think the article in general would benefit from having a rough structure in each section much more like: “The Iranian government says [claim about economic data]. X has alleged that [claim] is [inflated/false/manipulated], citing [evidence]. These allegations have been judged [credible/not credible] by [insert reliable sources].” At the moment the article reads much more like an argumentative essay, where you’re bringing together different pieces of evidence to support your contention that Iran’s economic data is manipulated.

For instance, this sentence from the article is a really good example of what you should be aiming for: Similarly, former President Hassan Rouhani's claim of 7.4% economic growth during his tenure was met with skepticism from Iranian economists and lawmakers. Critics contended that the reported figures did not align with industrial output or employment trends. (my only suggestion would here be to add a few more specifics from your cited source, like who the economists, lawmakers and critics actually are).

Whereas I don't understand the relevance of this paragraph at all. What is the allegation of manipulated economic data in this section, and who is making it? Iran suffers from over-education and over-supply of academic degrees. In 2015–2016, over 4.3 million students were enrolled in universities in Iran, which accounts for more than 5% of the country's total population, or 7.4% of its adult population (aged 19 and above). In comparison, in 2016, 20.4 million students, or a little over 6% of the U.S. population (8.3% of the U.S. adult population aged 19 and above), attended college. The U.S. economy was then approximately 47 times that of Iran's, and many of the graduates from U.S. colleges and universities were foreign nationals, who will likely contribute to the labor forces of their home countries.

I hope this helps, and like I said, I think you’ve done a good job on this article, so don’t be discouraged if it ends up being draftified — it just means you get a bit more time to develop it in draftspace. MCE89 (talk) 15:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MCE89 Thank you for your considerate and detailed feedback! And of course thank you for all your encouragement. It is so nice to receive constructive criticism from someone who genuinely wants to help. I will try to work on it more according to your suggestions. Thank you Razgura (talk) 12:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because of the result of its AfD. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CR (talk) 14:04, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Political Economy of Theocracy moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Political Economy of Theocracy. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 13:38, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sophisticatedevening

I placed the necessary citations in the text as required. However, they were removed in this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:The_Political_Economy_of_Theocracy&diff=prev&oldid=1279176286.

The user's argument that the citations are self referencing is inaccurate. The book itself is a collection of papers. I cited different papers published in the book. Each citation refers to a different paper.

If you would be so kind, can you restore the page?

Thank you Razgura (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's been restored, however it still needs a lot of work to be ready for mainspace. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 10:37, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

If citations aren't the issue I'm unsure what else needs improving. The article seems to be at a reasonable level.

Thank you Razgura (talk) 11:59, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is written a lot more like an essay than an encyclopedic article. I would check out the manual of style to help you out. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 12:29, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I revised the article according to Wikipedia's style manual. Could you check it, please? Razgura (talk) 13:04, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is still written in an essay-like style. Try to avoid writing it like a bullet point analysis, and also unbold the headings. Check out Four Upbuilding Discourses, 1843 as an example for reference if you need. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 13:13, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Breakfast with Giraffes

Hello, Razgura. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Breakfast with Giraffes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:13, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Saeed Khani (producer)

Hello, Razgura. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saeed Khani (producer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mahyar Ayyar

Hello, Razgura. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mahyar Ayyar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Breakfast with Giraffes

Hello, Razgura. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Breakfast with Giraffes".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:28, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Majid Azami

Hello Razgura, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Majid Azami, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majid Azami.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Czarking0}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Czarking0 (talk) 16:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Helping Iran Wiki

I wanted to take a moment to personally thank your very civil discussion. I hope you don't feel too much like I wasted your time and that it brings you some small pleasure to know that at least this one wikipedia editor has learned more about Iran from your efforts. Czarking0 (talk) 14:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Czarking0, Thank you for your kind message, it genuinely meant a lot. I definitely don’t feel like it was a waste of time. On the contrary, I’m glad the discussion contributed in any way, especially if it helped bring more awareness to a topic that’s often underrepresented on Wikipedia.

I also really appreciated the respectful and thoughtful way you engaged with everything. It made the whole process feel like a constructive exchange, not just a debate over policy.

Thanks again, and I look forward to crossing paths again in future discussions.

All the best, Razgura (talk) 12:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kashk-e Zard moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kashk-e Zard, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 11:05, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just a moment, my friend, don’t rush. In a few minutes, the article will be wonderful and delicious. Razgura (talk) 11:09, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MWFwiki were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Economy of Iran. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

1. Need to review MOS:TONE. No need to use phrases like "The subsequent sections highlight outline some of these inconsistencies." The first sentence of "background" is questionable. Words and phrases like "consequently," "Similarly," etc... just stick to encyclopedic language.

2. Is there a reason this cannot be merged to economy of Iran? That page doesn't even mention any of this (just at a glance, I could be wrong). I would start a section there, using this as a basis, maybe trim the fat a bit. If consensus there is that it needs its own page, then come here.

3."Iran suffers from over-education and over-supply of academic degrees" needs its own source. You can re-use the World Banks Blog source for it, but that sentence is a bold enough claim that it should have its own cite.

4. Otherwise, it looks good! If you fix everything, here, feel-free to ignore point number 2.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MWFwiki (talk) 01:07, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mahyar Ayyar

Hello, Razgura. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mahyar Ayyar".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History and culture of negotiation in Iran moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to History and culture of negotiation in Iran. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:27, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gheymeh Nesar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gheymeh Nesar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:28, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Mehdi Rabani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Mehdi Rabani. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Mehdi Rabbani. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Mehdi Rabbani. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. HumanRight 03:06, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am sorry, my mistake. Thank you for your comment Razgura (talk) 03:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]