User talk:Plmoin2514

CS1 error on Thailand Digital Arrival Card

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Thailand Digital Arrival Card, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:58, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Singapore Arrival Card (SGAC) (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoldRomean was:

Reads like a WP:HOWTO article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Singapore Arrival Card (SGAC) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoldRomean (talk) 01:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Plmoin2514! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoldRomean (talk) 01:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malaysia Digital Arrival Card (MDAC) (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sourced entirely to government websites — please add a few independent sources to prove notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malaysia Digital Arrival Card (MDAC) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:22, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback I have found more references now and re-submitted it again. Plmoin2514 (talk) 19:57, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to Talk:Thailand Digital Arrival Card can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Accusing an editor with 20 years experience and over 80,000 edits of operating sockpuppets is a very serious charge. You had better have some very solid evidence to back that accusation up. —C.Fred (talk) 19:57, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you post this to the wrong page? I have not made any accusations beyond vandalism issues? Plmoin2514 (talk) 19:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This edit, with the edit summary "reverted ongoing vandalism from Thai Visa Centre sock puppets " —C.Fred (talk) 20:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but that was not made in reference to you. I'm a little bit slow to submit my edits and it seems it is overwriting changes that others have made just seconds earlier. I was referring to the multiple 4G proxy IP addresses being used to vandalize the page, not you. Apologies for any misunderstanding, I will hold off any edits. Plmoin2514 (talk) 20:14, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Given that your edit was specifically to revert an edit by a named user, that doesn't hold a lot of water. While there have been three IP addresses editing the article in the past 24 hours, none of them have edited the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 20:18, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see who you are talking about now, is that Paul012? Yes, sorry about that. I might have been in too much of a hurry. Plmoin2514 (talk) 20:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Thailand Digital Arrival Card shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Coupled with your accusations against another editor, there are enough hallmarks of bad-faith editing here that your account could be blocked whether you violate 3RR or not. —C.Fred (talk) 20:02, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I didn't make any accusations against you, I've no idea what you are referring to? Plmoin2514 (talk) 20:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just added a link to where you made the allegation against Paul 012. —C.Fred (talk) 20:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also just deleted a large chunk of text you copied from raiyai.com. Please review WP:COPYVIO. —C.Fred (talk) 20:21, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay sorry thanks. Plmoin2514 (talk) 20:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Arrival card

A tag has been placed on Category:Arrival card indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Paul_012 (talk) 20:33, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]