User talk:Jbatlas

Welcome!

Hello, Jbatlas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --John (talk) 19:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to PSD (rapper). Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 19:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at PSD (rapper). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Claims made in articles require sources. This is especially true if they are controversial claims, such as anything involving criminal charges, lawsuits, or the like. —C.Fred (talk) 19:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, what's your source for the conviction you claim took place? —C.Fred (talk) 19:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please edit to prevent repeated vandalism to page. Thank you

Requests for page protection must be made at WP:RPP - but if you are talking about PSD (rapper) it will not be protected as articles need repeated vandalism and that article has only had 6 edits this year - Arjayay (talk) 09:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated Vandalism

Someone again has added unsourced information that is unverifiable. Thanks Jbatlas (talk) 05:31, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Leo Frank, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. I see that as a violation of WP:NPOV Doug Weller talk 09:29, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand how the lynchings of at least 17 Chinese Americans don’t count as the largest lynching known in American history compared to the 11 here nor how you can justify omitting this simply because the lynching is commonly known by a title which includes the word ‘massacre’ in it. It seems, unless I’m wrong, you are adamant in trying to give this unfortunate credit to the New Orleans men for personal reasons by your doggedness in not allowing anyone to correct it. I understand and respect you want to make sure the New Orleans lynching is memorable and is not forgotten, I don’t want it forgotten either, but again, unless I’m wrong, to bogart the page from anyone correcting misinformation is not only wrong but obtuse and furthermore deceitful. Thanks Jbatlas (talk) 07:16, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jbatlas! I noticed that you recently made an edit at 1891 New Orleans lynchings and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. You also ignored the message not to change it. That was the result of an RfC. Doug Weller talk 09:30, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]