User talk:Jackwilliamson1

This is Jackwilliamson1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmed Almuhr (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HickoryOughtShirt?4 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahmed Almuhr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HickoryOughtShirt?4. Thank you for the detailed analysis. I will search for reliable and independent sources online and revise the draft accordingly before resubmission. Thank you again. Jackwilliamson1 (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jackwilliamson1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @HickoryOughtShirt?4 I appreciate your assistance. I'll rewrite the article and look for more sources. Thanks. Jackwilliamson1 (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrea Lambert Fritz (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrea Lambert Fritz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 20:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Candice Pascoal moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Candice Pascoal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BuySomeApples (talk) 20:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BuySomeApples. Thank you for your feedback. Could you kindly clarify what you mean by a conflict of interest? I understand that the article may require additional sources to meet notability guidelines, and I am actively searching for more reliable references online. In the meantime, would it be acceptable to remove some of the content and republish the article as a stub? I plan to continue gathering and adding more sources to strengthen the article over time. Thank you again. Jackwilliamson1 (talk) 21:31, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jackwilliamson1: you can learn more about Wikipedia:Conflict of interests here. If you have a conflict of interest, you just need to follow the instructions there. Technically you can move the page back to mainspace but if it doesn't have enough sources, it will just get deleted. The only source that seems like WP:SIGCOV is the Vogue article. It makes more sense to wait until you add more sources to show that it meets WP:GNG. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Jackwilliamson1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Candice Pascoal, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BuySomeApples (talk) 21:37, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BuySomeApples Thank you for the detailed explanation on the conflict of interest thing. I don't work for or connected to the subject in any way. As per my understanding of your detailed analysis, I will rewrite the article and find more sources on the internet and will republish the page. Please correct me if this approach is wrong. Thanks. Jackwilliamson1 (talk) 23:28, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is the right way to do it, just make sure you pay attention to WP:RS and WP:GNG. Happy editing! BuySomeApples (talk) 05:43, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thanks. Jackwilliamson1 (talk) 17:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]