User talk:Epicion
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Epicion! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Kailash29792 (talk) 10:21, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Thudarum, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:40, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- If you read what I have removed, you can understand the mistakes written there. Epicion (talk) 09:43, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
April 2025
[edit] Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Madharasi, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Both the sources are not reliable. Do you reliable sources? It would be better if you look the edit before reverting. Epicion (talk) 11:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
May 2025
[edit]
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Gangers (film): you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. –HirowoWiki (📝) 03:07, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Done. Epicion (talk) 03:15, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
May 2025
[edit]
Please do not introduce unreliable sources into articles, as you did to Retro (film). Please read through the WP:ICTFMOS Indian Cinema guidelines on sources before introducing them into articles. Also, do not include non theatrical revenue into box office collections. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been corrected. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 05:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- According to whom are Times Now and Samayam considered unreliable sources? WP:ICTFSOURCES does not list them as unreliable. Epicion (talk) 05:41, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Please look at the list of Generally used sources table in the page. Only the ones with green tick needs to be used and also need to make sure the source doent refer to any other unreliable sources or producers quote. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 05:44, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- WP:ICTFSOURCES does not list them as unreliable. Also, the collection data currently cited is outdated, and the film is now in its third week. Please try to use more recent sources. Epicion (talk) 05:45, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Only the ones with green tick are consiered as reliable ones, only those needs to be used and also we need to make sure the reliable ones does not take reference from unreliable ones or take reference from producers of the film. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 05:47, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- The sources never mention about producers of the film. Epicion (talk) 05:48, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- But the sources are not in the list of reliable sources, hence these cannot be used. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 05:50, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- They are never mentioned in any of the discussions as unreliable. Epicion (talk) 05:51, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- If you need to add them to the reliable list, then you have to start a discussion in the talk page, and you need to justify why the source is reliable, after consensus from Admins, the source might be added to the reliable list. Post then you can use the source in Indian cinema articles. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 05:53, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Can ABP Live source can be used as it is mentioned in Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force/ICTF FAQ. I'm asking became the collection data currently cited is outdated, and the film is now in its third week. Epicion (talk) 05:57, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- You can use The Telegraph (India) by ABP Group which is a reliable source. But while adding it, do not remove the other reliable sources, we always use a range to represent BO numbers Tonyy Starkk (talk) 06:08, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Other sources are old and they haven't updated the collection. Try to use latest source. Epicion (talk) 06:21, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- For now we can wait till the film moves out of cinemas, post that we will get a complete clarity on the final box office from reliable sources. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 06:39, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- That's why I'm asking to use latest source. I'm updating the box office figure now. Please don't revert it. Epicion (talk) 06:41, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Use only reliable sources. Dont add unreliable ones. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 06:43, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Over 4500 article use Times Now source. So can't it be reliable? Epicion (talk) 06:47, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- ABP live is not present in WP:ICTFSOURCES, but present in the FAQ page which is contradicting here. Also the article you used is in Hindi.
- Also you have deleted the other reliable sources. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 07:01, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- The source is reliable per WP:ICTFFAQ. So we can use it. Removed other sources as they are old. Please use latest source. Epicion (talk) 07:03, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Over 4500 article use Times Now source. So can't it be reliable? Epicion (talk) 06:47, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Use only reliable sources. Dont add unreliable ones. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 06:43, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- That's why I'm asking to use latest source. I'm updating the box office figure now. Please don't revert it. Epicion (talk) 06:41, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- For now we can wait till the film moves out of cinemas, post that we will get a complete clarity on the final box office from reliable sources. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 06:39, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Other sources are old and they haven't updated the collection. Try to use latest source. Epicion (talk) 06:21, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- You can use The Telegraph (India) by ABP Group which is a reliable source. But while adding it, do not remove the other reliable sources, we always use a range to represent BO numbers Tonyy Starkk (talk) 06:08, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Can ABP Live source can be used as it is mentioned in Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force/ICTF FAQ. I'm asking became the collection data currently cited is outdated, and the film is now in its third week. Epicion (talk) 05:57, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- If you need to add them to the reliable list, then you have to start a discussion in the talk page, and you need to justify why the source is reliable, after consensus from Admins, the source might be added to the reliable list. Post then you can use the source in Indian cinema articles. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 05:53, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- They are never mentioned in any of the discussions as unreliable. Epicion (talk) 05:51, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- But the sources are not in the list of reliable sources, hence these cannot be used. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 05:50, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- The sources never mention about producers of the film. Epicion (talk) 05:48, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Only the ones with green tick are consiered as reliable ones, only those needs to be used and also we need to make sure the reliable ones does not take reference from unreliable ones or take reference from producers of the film. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 05:47, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- WP:ICTFSOURCES does not list them as unreliable. Also, the collection data currently cited is outdated, and the film is now in its third week. Please try to use more recent sources. Epicion (talk) 05:45, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Please look at the list of Generally used sources table in the page. Only the ones with green tick needs to be used and also need to make sure the source doent refer to any other unreliable sources or producers quote. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 05:44, 20 May 2025 (UTC)