User talk:92GTA

92GTA, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi 92GTA! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC James Ivory (clockmaker) was accepted

James Ivory (clockmaker), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:05, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Timothy Keliher (lawman)

Hello, 92GTA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Timothy Keliher (lawman), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2001 Ducati 996R moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2001 Ducati 996R. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it may contain copyright violations. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2001 Ducati 996R (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.bonhams.com/auctions/17664/lot/426/, https://www.ducati.com/ww/en/heritage/bikes/996-f01. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:2001 Ducati 996R may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright (Draft:2001 Ducati 996R)

Hello,

You have included a large number of images in Draft:2001 Ducati 996R, each uploaded as your 'own work'. 'Own work' almost always means that you have actually taken the photograph or created the artistic design, and moreover that you own the copyright in them (meaning that they were not created as course of employment, etc.). While some of the images are straightforward photographs that you could indeed have taken (whether you did or not, I don't know, but you could have), others seem to be posters and other publicity material which appears to have come out of Ducati's or someone else's marketing department. Could you please clarify the source of these images, and confirm whether you are indeed the copyright owner, and whether you really intended to release the copyright into the public domain using a Creative Commons licence?

Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:41, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Yes I did take most of the photos myself but you are correct, there are some Ducati marketing photos that I can go back to my uploads and correctly re-attribute.

How would you suggest I handle the screenshots of the old Ducati.com I took from The Internet Archive? Those would be the only ones I'm not sure of. Thanks! 92GTA (talk) 17:02, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really a copyright expert, you're better off asking at the WM Commons copyright helpdesk, they can then also help you action any deleting, tagging, etc. that may come out of this. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:08, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:51, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, and I will be thoroughly diligent doing this going forward. It just didn't seem feasible to do when first creating the article from scratch and doing massive dumps of info all over the place and constantly re-organising large portions, etc. But now that's it's in the review cycle going forward I will ensure I notate all edits. Thank you! 92GTA (talk) 17:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:2001 Ducati 996R has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2001 Ducati 996R. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:48, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ducati 996R (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi editor: you've obviously worked really hard on this draft but it does have major problems:

1). vast contents of the draft are completely unsourced with no in-line citations. Every statement should be sourced to comply with WP:VERIFY.

2). some sections are not written in an encyclopaedic way: a Wikipedia article should never pose a question to the reader, should never state opinions, and should never use the personal voice. It's difficult to pick out which bits need changing because it is unfortunately most of it. Please carefully read WP:NPOV, WP:MOS, and WP:PEACOCK.

3). It is simply too much information. See WP:TMI.

My advice would be to really cut down on this draft to the basic, sourced, facts. And maybe publish what you've got here on a personal blog or something- it simply isn't appropriate for Wikipedia in its current state. Sorry.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ducati 996R and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 20:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ducati 996R (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Consider studying the style of existing high-quality articles, such as Imme R100.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ducati 996R and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 (talk) 05:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:D. A. Baker (lawman)

Hello, 92GTA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:D. A. Baker (lawman), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ducati 996R

Hello, 92GTA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ducati 996R, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ducati 996R has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ducati 996R. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 15:25, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ducati 996R has been accepted

Ducati 996R, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:01, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: D. A. Baker (lawman) (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoldRomean was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:D. A. Baker (lawman) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoldRomean (talk) 18:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Timothy Keliher (lawman) (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoldRomean was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Timothy Keliher (lawman) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoldRomean (talk) 18:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]