The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93talk 23:21, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
@AmateurHi$torian: Interesting hook but the article may need more varied sources. Apart from that the article is new and long enough. The subject matter is interesting and I think the article meets the criteria. Good job. Moondragon21 (talk) 01:47, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, I'd forgotten all about this nomination. -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 14:08, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
@Moondragon21: Academic sources discussing the mosque in detail have proven hard to find, apart from the book and article written by S. Parihar. I've added a news source. There might be more sources in the local language(s), but as of now, these are all I can access. -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 14:08, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
@AmateurHi$torian: Interesting hook but the article may need more varied sources. Apart from that the article is new and long enough. The subject matter is interesting and I think the article meets the criteria. Good job. Moondragon21 (talk) 01:47, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Good work. Approved. Moondragon21 (talk) 18:11, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
