The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: To do QPQs within a day or two. Apologies for being slightly late, hopefully this can be excused per WP:DYKG: The seven-day limit can be extended for a day or two upon request.
Moved to mainspace by BeanieFan11 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 372 past nominations.
Regardless of the QPQ, which I feel should've been done before the nomination, this article appears to have been moved to mainspace eight days before the nomination, a day over the seven-day deadline. Unfortunately, this means this article is right now ineligible for DYK. If you still want to nominate this article for DYK, I recommend first nominating it for WP:GA; a successful nomination will make the article eligible for DYK again. Lazman321 (talk) 03:02, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
@Lazman321: According to WP:DYKG: The seven-day limit can be extended for a day or two upon request. I can do two QPQs early tomorrow (Friday) to make up for the slight lateness. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:17, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Sorry for the confusion. Please try to get the QPQ as soon as possible. Lazman321 (talk) 03:35, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Overall: Article moved from draft 4 June 2025 and nominated on 12 June 2025. Per WP:DYKG, the seven-day limit on nominating an article can be relaxed by a day or two. The article is of sufficient length. Per Earwig comes up as 1.0%, which is no great surprise given that most of the citations are from newspapers.com. Though Ewarwig wouldn't pick up any copyvios from newspapers.com, of the citations I did read I didn't see any close paraphrasing. Hook is supported by a reference. QPQ is done. Good to go. TarnishedPathtalk 10:05, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Regardless of the QPQ, which I feel should've been done before the nomination, this article appears to have been moved to mainspace eight days before the nomination, a day over the seven-day deadline. Unfortunately, this means this article is right now ineligible for DYK. If you still want to nominate this article for DYK, I recommend first nominating it for WP:GA; a successful nomination will make the article eligible for DYK again. Lazman321 (talk) 03:02, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Sorry for the confusion. Please try to get the QPQ as soon as possible. Lazman321 (talk) 03:35, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Article moved from draft 4 June 2025 and nominated on 12 June 2025. Per WP:DYKG, the seven-day limit on nominating an article can be relaxed by a day or two. The article is of sufficient length. Per Earwig comes up as 1.0%, which is no great surprise given that most of the citations are from newspapers.com. Though Ewarwig wouldn't pick up any copyvios from newspapers.com, of the citations I did read I didn't see any close paraphrasing. Hook is supported by a reference. QPQ is done. Good to go. TarnishedPathtalk 10:05, 20 June 2025 (UTC)