Talk:Supersessionism
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Supersessionism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 2 months ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dow Marmur source
[edit]The article has been using a speech by Dow Marmur as a reference. This is a problem because:
- A speech is effectively a self-published source.
- An accurate transcription of a speech is generally not fact-checked
- A self-published source can be used if from an acknowledged expert, but within the speech itself, Marmur distances himself from expertise on the topic ("This presentation has few scholarly pretensions, first of all, because the subject isn't really my field of academic interest, and secondly, because there's nothing I may have to say today that this audience doesn't know much better.")
Add on top of that, I cannot find the specific claim being made in the source, that some Jews are offended by the belief in supersessionism (that they are troubled by the attempts and goals of converting Jews, yes, but that's a different statement.) As such, I'm removing that supposed source. --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
New Covenant theology
[edit]New Covenant theology doesn't seem to be an alternative to supersessionism but an example of it. 73.87.154.155 (talk) 11:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's kind of a middle ground between dispensationalism and covenant theology. So it is an alternative. —Confession0791 talk 13:11, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Disagree. I think this is a category error. Dispensationalism is a framework that historically opposes supersessionism, covenant theology (incl. new covenant) is a framework that generally supports it. Dirkwillems (talk) 20:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Change the link
[edit]I assume it was not supposed to refer to the current political entity State of Israel
הראש (talk) 09:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- I think that is referring to the nation of Israel as a people including those Jews living in the State of Israel JamieBrown2011 (talk) 07:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
unclear antecedent
[edit]Article states, "Islam teaches that it is the final and most authentic expression of Abrahamic monotheism, superseding both Judaism and Christianity." Not sure what "it" is supposed to refer to here—the antecedent from the preceding sentence should be "supercessionism," but I suspect it is meant to refer to Islam itself. Needs clarification. 98.195.219.14 (talk) 00:20, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- The paragraph could probably stand some cleanup, but I think that taken in context it's evident that "it" refers to Islam. But it would be awkward to say "Islam teaches that Islam is the final and most authentic..." If you can think of some better way to phrase it, do so. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- C-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- C-Class Judaism articles
- Low-importance Judaism articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- Mid-importance Christianity articles
- C-Class Christian theology articles
- High-importance Christian theology articles
- Christian theology work group articles
- C-Class Reformed Christianity articles
- High-importance Reformed Christianity articles
- WikiProject Reformed Christianity articles
- C-Class Latter Day Saint movement articles
- Low-importance Latter Day Saint movement articles
- WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- High-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles