Jump to content

Talk:Snuff bottle/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 22:31, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: MSincccc (talk · contribs) 15:31, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Prose

[edit]
Lead
  • Could the relevant language template be added to the article mainspace?
  • the European snuff-boxes→European snuff-boxes
  • by the 1800 → by the 1800s
History
  • The first reliable evidence of snuff bottles is during the reign of the Kangxi Emperor...
    • is during → dates to
  • Domestic snuff production began around the end of the century in Yanzhou, Shandong; however, this was generally judged...
    • around→by
    • is during → dates to
Design
  • quandrangular → quadrangular
  • can be → could be
    • Past tense aligns with “were produced.”
  • Stoppers are often topped → Stoppers were often topped
    • Past tense to match the historical framing (“featured,” “was used”).
  • These are themselves often topped → These were themselves often topped
    • Again, for tense consistency.
  • the emperor whose reign→ the emperor under whose reign
  • “stands which allow” → “stands which allowed”
  • boxes have → boxes had
  • These have cavities... → These had cavities...
Materials
  • complicated figure moulds → complicated figure molds
  • lend themselves to be made → lend themselves to being made
    • Correct idiom in American English: “lend themselves to being” + past participle.
  • Quartz was often chosen for the rich colors often found in the rock. The word "often" is repeated unnecessarily in the same sentence.
  • Ivory is common → Ivory was common
    • Past tense to match “were made,” since this is historical description.
  • are fashioned → were fashioned
    • Consistent with the historical context.
  • and generally feature lacquer stoppers → and generally featured lacquer stoppers

 ⟶ Past tense for consistency with the sentence (“were produced…”). MSincccc (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decoration
  • was primarily done → were primarily done
    • Compound subject (engraving and carving) = plural verb.
  • are generally representational figures → were generally representational figures
    • include → included
    • To match past tense framing.
  • are often painted → were often painted
  • can feature” → could feature
  • was carved the design → were carved the designs
  • feature → featured
  • feature intricate designs → featured intricate designs
  • rub away at → rub away
Collecting
  • Link Chinese art?
  • western interest → Western interest

Bottom line The article as a whole reads well. I enjoyed reading through the prose — this was my first introduction to snuff bottles. A few corrections to bring about tense consistency and the prose will meet GA standards. MSincccc (talk) 17:54, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]
  • I would suggest adding alt text to the captions of all the images.

I've made a start here. The prose is interesting and engaging. mi wile e ni: sina kama jo e wile pi pali mi. (I hope you found my suggestions useful.) MSincccc (talk) 13:31, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! Got to all these. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 15:44, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]