Talk:Snuff bottle/GA1
GA review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 22:31, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: MSincccc (talk · contribs) 15:31, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Prose
[edit]- Lead
- Could the relevant language template be added to the article mainspace?
- the European snuff-boxes→European snuff-boxes
- by the 1800 → by the 1800s
- History
- The first reliable evidence of snuff bottles is during the reign of the Kangxi Emperor...
- is during → dates to
- Domestic snuff production began around the end of the century in Yanzhou, Shandong; however, this was generally judged...
- around→by
- is during → dates to
- Design
- quandrangular → quadrangular
- can be → could be
- Past tense aligns with “were produced.”
- Stoppers are often topped → Stoppers were often topped
- Past tense to match the historical framing (“featured,” “was used”).
- These are themselves often topped → These were themselves often topped
- Again, for tense consistency.
- the emperor whose reign→ the emperor under whose reign
- “stands which allow” → “stands which allowed”
- boxes have → boxes had
- These have cavities... → These had cavities...
- The paragraph starts with past tense (“were often placed,” “were often transported”), so verbs should remain in past tense for consistency. MSincccc (talk) 13:51, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Materials
- complicated figure moulds → complicated figure molds
- lend themselves to be made → lend themselves to being made
- Correct idiom in American English: “lend themselves to being” + past participle.
- Quartz was often chosen for the rich colors often found in the rock. The word "often" is repeated unnecessarily in the same sentence.
- Ivory is common → Ivory was common
- Past tense to match “were made,” since this is historical description.
- are fashioned → were fashioned
- Consistent with the historical context.
- and generally feature lacquer stoppers → and generally featured lacquer stoppers
⟶ Past tense for consistency with the sentence (“were produced…”). MSincccc (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Decoration
- was primarily done → were primarily done
- Compound subject (engraving and carving) = plural verb.
- are generally representational figures → were generally representational figures
- include → included
- To match past tense framing.
- are often painted → were often painted
- can feature” → could feature
- was carved the design → were carved the designs
- feature → featured
- feature intricate designs → featured intricate designs
- rub away at → rub away
- Collecting
- Link Chinese art?
- western interest → Western interest
Bottom line The article as a whole reads well. I enjoyed reading through the prose — this was my first introduction to snuff bottles. A few corrections to bring about tense consistency and the prose will meet GA standards. MSincccc (talk) 17:54, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Images
[edit]- I would suggest adding alt text to the captions of all the images.
I've made a start here. The prose is interesting and engaging. mi wile e ni: sina kama jo e wile pi pali mi. (I hope you found my suggestions useful.) MSincccc (talk) 13:31, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Okay! Got to all these. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 15:44, 6 July 2025 (UTC)