Jump to content

Talk:S. R. Goyal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Feedback from New Page Review process

[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work

North8000 (talk) 20:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:S. R. Goyal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Garudam (talk · contribs) 21:53, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 22:58, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I'm going to have to fail this nomination as being a long way from hitting criterion 3- the article almost entirely consists of a bibliography, with only a few sentences of information about his career or historical focuses. I'd recommend looking at current GAs and FAs of historians to see what sort of length and breadth is standard at this level. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 22:58, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.