Talk:Nox Archaist

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Grinding Gear Games (1 participant)
Parallax Studio (2 participants)
Papaya Studio (0 participants)
Beyond Software (3 participants)
Vulcan Software (3 participants)
PomPom Games (1 participant)
Pirate Software (19 participants)
Parroty Interactive (3 participants)
Razorworks (2 participants)
Jim Rossignol (3 participants)
Kuju (company) (5 participants)
Rabbid Peach (10 participants)
GXCW (3 participants)
Hidari (illustrator) (5 participants; relisted)
Toi8 (5 participants; relisted)
Shanghai Mini (3 participants; relisted)
Edelweiss (visual novel) (8 participants; relisted)
Illuvium (company) (1 participant; relisted)
Maciej Frączyk (2 participants; relisted)
Parsoft Interactive (2 participants; relisted)
Point of View (company) (4 participants; relisted)
Circus (company) (4 participants; relisted)
Conflict (video game) (4 participants; relisted)
Project Moon (4 participants; relisted)
Brace Yourself Games (4 participants; relisted)
BitComposer Interactive (4 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Reinserting third-party sourced achievements

Hi all, 👋

I’m the developer of Nox Archaist, and I’m posting here in line with Wikipedia’s COI guidelines. I noticed that some content was recently removed from the "Innovations and achievements" section due to WP:ABOUTSELF concerns. That makes sense for parts sourced from my own book, and I understand the rationale there.

However, I’d like to suggest re-adding two items that do have independent, third-party sourcing and appear to meet Wikipedia’s standards for verifiability and notability:

🏆 Ultima Codex favorite fan project of 2017 (source)

🖥️ TOP 10 cRPG of year 2020 by RPG Codex (source)

Note: the original source for the RPG Codex Award required clicking a potentially unobvious link to get to the relevant content. The source linked above is a direct link, scroll down to the top 10 table and Nox Archaist is listed in slot 10.

These achievements were part of the previous version of the article and seem like notable recognitions others might want to know about. I wanted to float this here before making an edit, in case others had thoughts or concerns. Happy to discuss and refine if needed.

Thanks! Retro Gamer11 (talk) 04:09, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]