Talk:F1 24/GA1
GA review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: CanonNi (talk · contribs) 00:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 10:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Will read through soon. Jaguar (talk) 10:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! [[User:CanonNi]] (💬 • ✍️) 10:50, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Lead
- "EA Sports F1 24, also called EA F1 24 or F1 24, is a racing video game" - this would be better on in brackets rather than commas
- "The game was released on 31 May, or three days earlier for users who pre-ordered the Champions' Edition" - 31 May 2024 worldwide? What about the other regions? Please specify
- The lead is far too short as it stands, and currently does not summarise the article. Development is missing and the reception should be typically at the bottom of the second paragraph, rather than at the end of the first
- Body
- No gameplay screenshot?
- "The story mode returned in F1 25." - unsourced
- "players drive cars using game controllers or steering wheels." - specify open wheel racing cars
- "F1 24 introduced a new career mode" - should not be in past tense
- "in which players play as real drivers" - in which players play as real professional Formula One drivers
- I feel the gameplay section is too short and does not adequately summarise all of the gameplay mechanics, can you expand it?
- "An announcement trailer was released on 27 February" - what year?
- I am concerned with the comprehensiveness of the reception section. It must be expanded to meet the GA criteria - there are reviews in the reception box which aren't included in the prose!
At the moment, the article does not meet the GA criteria. A lack of comprehensiveness is its main issue, along with a few minor prose issues which can be rectified. The reception section must be expanded to reflect all the reviewers' comments; at the moment, only the Guardian, IGN, and PC Gamer are in the prose, and inadequate summaries at that. I will leave this review on hold for you so that you can facilitate an article expansion. The article is too short and devoid of content to meet the criteria, but I believe changes can be made. Let me know if you have any questions. I would recommend comparing the reception section to those of other video game GAs. Jaguar (talk) 14:10, 23 June 2025 (UTC)