Jump to content

Talk:KPTM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KPTM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on KPTM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:43, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:KPTM/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 19:24, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 01:41, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will do a review on this.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 01:41, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
  • which provides certain services – why "certain" services?
  • While KPTM aired a 9 p.m. newscast for more than 30 years, a major attempt at expansion in the late 1990s was rolled back for economic reasons less than 18 months later – The sentences don't really connect. Unless there were other newscasts scheduled during the expansion. Might just suggest splitting

History

[edit]
  • with an eye to establishing – might reword with the aim to establish...
  • Competition grew crowded for channel 15 – I'm unsure if "grew crowded" is encyclopedic
  • appealed the FCC's decision to the commission's review board and then to the full FCC – The full FCC as in, the organisation as a whole? Also I might reword to appealed the decision to the FCC review board and then to the full FCC...
    • The FCC's commissioners. Back in those days, when you appealed the initial decision, it went to a review board. And if you lost there, you could appeal to the commission itself. If you lost there, your only recourse was the courts.
  • Ref 8 checks out on the initials
  • Ref 14 checks out. But is there any more reason why Pappas filed for bankruptcy? There seems to be a bit of a gap on its fortunes.
  • Ref 16 checks out
  • Also in 2009, the station completed its conversion to digital television on June 12. – A bit awkward/unencyclopedic to start off with "Also in 2009". Might rewrite The station had completed its conversion to digital television on June 12, 2009.
  • For Ref 22, I would actually have Sinclair Broadcast Group to be the publisher instead of the author. But this is a rather trivial source formatting comment

News operation

[edit]
  • Ref 33 checks out but I think there needs to be another source to show it's part of the global recession. Because (and this is just my impression) the source doesn't really specify what economic recession and it could be referring to a slowdown in Omaha's or US's economy. There needs to be a more direct link.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 03:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fair. In hindsight, it's definitely that, but we can't directly say it.
  • Refs 31, 35, 40 check out

Technical information

[edit]

Not much issues really for this relatively short article. Putting on hold.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 03:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, everything is satisfactory. Passed.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 12:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 766 past nominations.

Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 05:54, 10 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]