Jump to content

Talk:Jeffrey Epstein

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Copying to Lolita Express

[edit]

Original police report was claimed to be 30 people, not 5, not 34, not 36

[edit]

The record is online but is mentioned several times here along with one person who broke down and told interrogator what they wanted.

https://www.insider.com/ghislaine-maxwell-testimony-jeffrey-epstein-released-2020-10?back=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fsearch%3Fclient%3Dsafari%26as_qdr%3Dall%26as_occt%3Dany%26safe%3Dactive%26as_q%3DEpstein+trial+testimony%26channel%3Daplab%26source%3Da-app1%26hl%3Den

Jeffrey Epstein jail cell CCTV footage

[edit]

Should we add this video to the article? Trade (talk) 08:19, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is covered here. I'm not sure if this adds anything significantly new, but someone may add it to the article.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 09:18, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have any better videos of Epstein while he was alive? Trade (talk) 21:50, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have just read this article on his profile, and after all the court publications from the Eileen Maxwell trial,
Also watching Michael wolves videos on this subject matter, especially the missing prison video footage and the money, laundering implications that Epstein had on Mr Chump
on top of That
Mr. Chump is John Doe 174 in Elaine Maxwell's trial transcripts, #FACTS MATTER Kingjames52 (talk) 15:00, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It was the USII Maydd888 (talk) 05:47, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article."

[edit]

What's the context of this warning? Which viewpoints have been recruited? Trade (talk) 21:51, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First off, where is this statement located? Jusdafax (talk) 04:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Epstein list

[edit]

So how come we do not have an article about the Epstein list? It is one of the hottest topics in the US media, and has been for years, yet Wikipedia has nothing. Obviously it should name people, but having no article about it is rather odd. I doubt that nobody has thought of creating it, so what am I missing? Surtsicna (talk) 21:07, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Make a draft if you want Trade (talk) 22:25, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draft:Epstein list — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trade (talkcontribs) 22:25, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm surprised there isn't a broader article called Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking scandal. Information about "Epstein list" can go in that article. Some1 (talk) 22:49, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Here you go ... Jeffrey Epstein client list No Swan So Fine (talk) 09:31, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's way too short and would need to be a lot longer to meet WP:GNG.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 11:44, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That is what I had expected to find when I typed in "Epstein list" three days ago. Thank you, @No Swan So Fine. What do you think about nominating it for WP:DYK? Surtsicna (talk) 07:50, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We also need Jeffrey Epstein's Black Book (which is what I think the fictional list pertains to) Jeffrey Epstein cases timeline (to guide the reader and tie all this together) Epstein Files (which have been released post death). His article really is sprawling and needs a more cohesive structure. No Swan So Fine (talk) 13:42, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a broader article about the whole Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking scandal? If not, I suggest creating one instead of all these multiple smaller articles. Some1 (talk) 14:41, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, I think that would be sensible to keep stuff structured sensibly.
(Cause now you have it spread out over his own bio article and this new "Epstein list" article...) 91.89.56.16 (talk) 17:57, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe a split can be proposed? I think the scandal itself is wider than himself and should warrant its own article. Syn73 (talk) 02:58, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Make it should be called something like Epstein Files because that's what most news platforms are describing it as. Rexxx7777 (talk) 18:44, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Update with response from Pam Bondi explaining missing minute from footage.

[edit]

AG Bondi said the explanation was that it’s a glitch that happens every night when they reset the camera.https://www.unilad.com/news/us-news/jeffrey-epstein-missing-minute-video-footage-pam-bondi-978330-20250709 CalvinCoolidge228 (talk) 03:25, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Different wording

[edit]

For the caption on the CCTV footage, I believe this quote should be changed from "CCTV footage released in July 2025 showing the outside of Epstein's cell" to "CCTV footage released in July 2025 showing Epstein's cell block." The footage itself does not actually show Epstein's cell. Sosumiw (talk) 21:34, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The current caption is indeed wrong, but it does not show Epstein's cell block either. The area of interest is the upper left quarter of the frame - the "white" area - which is part of a common area across which Epstein walks near the start of the video. The doors are a different block of cells from that containing Espstein's.
So I think the caption should read something like ""CCTV footage released in July 2025 showing part of a common area within Epstein's prison" 2A0B:5F04:5047:4F00:490B:D636:8205:9DF6 (talk) 15:42, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. I've circled the area here which shows where the camera was positioned. The L Tier is where Epstein was housed. Sosumiw (talk) 13:35, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Semitic section removed

[edit]

There was a section previously that linked Epstein with Israel and Mossad. This is a case similar to blood libel and has no place in Wikipedia. Azuizo (talk) 19:10, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not antisemitism. 2603:7000:8800:EE11:94AA:AC3A:6E0E:599D (talk) 06:13, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That statement is not correct. It is NOT antisemitic to imply Epstein was an israli asset or operative. 108.88.197.8 (talk) 00:30, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
He was an Israeli operative though 96.27.47.40 (talk) 20:22, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 July 2025

[edit]

Change "at least one minute of it was missing,[20]" to "2 minutes and 53 seconds were missing," using the source https://www.wired.com/story/the-fbis-jeffrey-epstein-prison-video-had-nearly-3-minutes-cut-out/. This is a WIRED article, similar to the one used for citation 20, that describes more recent and relevant information regarding the doctored video file. IanMcCartney (talk) 01:31, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done with an additional reference to avoid a possible WP:ONESOURCE issue. UmbyUmbreon (talk) 02:01, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the word siblings

[edit]

Jeffrey was the older of the two; he and his brother Mark grew up in the working-class neighborhood of Sea Gate, a private gated community in Coney Island, Brooklyn. 134.255.241.130 (talk) 07:29, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Effrey jepstein has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 23 § Effrey jepstein until a consensus is reached. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 06:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2025

[edit]

Why aren't the close relationships with Bill and Hillary Clinton noted? Would that be because your political beliefs won't allow it? 203.30.4.27 (talk) 04:32, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. If you are wondering why something is not included, then please provide the specific text that you would like to add to the page to redress it. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 05:24, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2025

[edit]

Change death by hanging to murder. 2600:100F:B212:3424:B5B8:13D8:77E1:3B50 (talk) 19:21, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Provide a reliable source first. –Inimn (Talk) 19:27, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is a popular conspiracy theory; like Inimn said, this will not be added unless it can be verified by a reliable source. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 19:33, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 July 2025

[edit]

In the Banking section: "Even though Epstein departed abruptly, he remained close to Cayne and Greenberg and was a client of Bear Stearns until its collapse in 2008." The link for "its collapse in 2008" should be changed.

Please change: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_Stearns#Lead-up_to_the_failure_%E2%80%93_increasing_exposure_to_subprime_mortgage

to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_Stearns#Lead-up_to_the_failure_%E2%80%93_increasing_exposure_to_subprime_mortgages

Note the missing 's' at the end of the bad link. Jakespeedorg (talk) 06:33, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 06:44, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2025

[edit]

The mention of Mette-Marit should be removed from the lead on WP:UNDUE grounds, as has similarly been discussed on her own article. It does not seem right to me at all to list her alongside the likes of Trump, Clinton and Prince Andrew. The controversy from her meetings is nowhere near the scale of the other three cases. For what it's worth, the sentence mentioning these friendships was added recently. 80.189.57.169 (talk) 23:21, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Day Creature (talk) 01:27, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]