Jump to content

Talk:James II of England

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleJames II of England is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 22, 2006.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 19, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
January 5, 2007Featured article reviewDemoted
November 4, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 12, 2005, February 12, 2006, February 12, 2007, January 22, 2012, January 22, 2015, January 22, 2016, January 22, 2017, January 22, 2018, January 22, 2019, January 22, 2020, January 22, 2022, and January 22, 2023.
Current status: Featured article

Legacy

[edit]

I don't want to muck up a pretty well-run page but there ought to be a section on things named after the guy. Inter alia, per page 239 in

  • McEwen, Alec (July 1988), "The English Place-Names of the Galápagos", The Geographical Journal, vol. 154, London: Royal Geographical Society, pp. 234–242.

he was the namesake of James Island in the Galapagos Archipelago. It's officially Santiago Island now but the English name still shows up a lot and was granted by a pirate named Ambrosia. — LlywelynII 15:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

“Scottish Parliament”

[edit]

Chapter 3.4: “On 11 April 1689, the Parliament of Scotland declared James to have forfeited the throne of Scotland as well.” If this sentence refers to the same event mentioned in the introduction of the article, the declaration was issued by the Convention, not exactly Parliament. Is that correct or was there a separate declaration by Parliament as well?—Oudeístalk 05:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 February 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. – robertsky (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


James II of EnglandJames VII and II – He was not only the king of England. He was also the king of Scotland and Ireland. James VII and II is both more accurate than the current title and also completely unambiguous, so you can get rid of the territorial designation that only refers to one of his realms, since there was only one James VII and II. The Scottish number should go first for consistency with James VI and I. DieOuTransvaal (talk) 23:25, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

I find it strange that this article makes no mention of James' active service as an admiral in the navy. He was standing alongside three courtiers who had their heads taken off by a chain shot at the Battle of Lowestoft, spattering the Duke of York (as he then was) with blood and brains. At the Battle of Solebay, HMS Prince was surrounded by Dutch ships and other British warships could not get close to give assistance as the winds were virtually calm. In this desperate position, James went up and down the ship encouraging the men. The captain of Prince was killed a short distance away from James, as were other's in James' entourage. The main topmast was taken out by a Dutch cannon ball, making the ship uncontrollable. She was towed away from the enemy by her boats and James transferred to St Michael and returned to the battle, becoming heavily engaged, having to transfer his flag for a second time later in the battle.

The way the article reads, one could get the impression that James carried out his activities as an admiral from the safety of a desk in Whitehall. This is obviously a substantial misrepresentation of his role.

The sources I have used in making these comments are Davies, J. D. (2017). Kings of the Sea: Charles II, James II and the Royal Navy. Barnsley: Seaforth Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84832-400-8., particularly pg 192 – but the whole book is relevant – and Journals and Narratives of the Third Dutch War, Navy Records Society, Vol 86 (1946), R.C. Anderson (ed.), the journals of John Narborough. I appreciate the latter is a primary source, but plenty of other histories are available.
ThoughtIdRetired TIR 22:25, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]