Jump to content

Talk:Imelda Marcos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleImelda Marcos was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 12, 2014Peer reviewNot reviewed
March 31, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
March 23, 2015Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 26, 2016Good article nomineeListed
April 29, 2016Peer reviewNot reviewed
May 6, 2016Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 19, 2016Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 9, 2018Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 31, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Imelda Marcos (pictured) spent US$2,000 on chewing gum in an airport stop?
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 4, 2014, and November 4, 2016.
Current status: Delisted good article

So... about the shoes

[edit]

Are we just failing the article having only a single pair here and at Wikicommons? or there legitimately aren't actual photographs of an actual collection and this is just a successful urban myth / political hit job? — LlywelynII 13:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vice has a piece here (with photos!) Howard the Duck (talk) 17:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A large part of the collection is on display at the Presidential Palace in Manila. Saw it myself. Davidkt (talk) 23:18, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Children

[edit]

Can someone edit the information box where it lists the four children of Imelda Marcos and mentions (adopted) at the last one? It is rather odd to include this distinction there instead of in the "personal life" section where it belongs. 2001:1C01:4216:A400:44E9:CE0C:A226:AB60 (talk) 10:43, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neither Template:Infobox officeholder nor Template:Infobox person give any advice, so yes I think that could be removed. But there is no "Personal life" section, where each of the children might be named and linked? And Aimee Marcos is not mentioned anywhere outside the infobox. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:54, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I meant the infobox. Could the (adopted) be removed? Just looks so odd to put it there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C01:4216:A400:44E9:CE0C:A226:AB60 (talk) 12:58, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know you meant that, thanks. I'm saying there's currently nowhere else to put it. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:06, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural Influence

[edit]

In the "Portrayals in news and art" section, adding the 1988 Big Audio Dynamite song "2000 Shoes" would be appropriate as it's entirely about Imelda. Lyrics here - https://genius.com/Big-audio-dynamite-2000-shoes-lyrics Davidkt (talk) 23:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]