Jump to content

Talk:Final Fantasy VI

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleFinal Fantasy VI is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starFinal Fantasy VI is part of the Final Fantasy series series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 20, 2007.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 8, 2005WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
August 9, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
September 11, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 11, 2006Good article nomineeListed
July 19, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
July 31, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
November 7, 2006Featured topic candidatePromoted
June 24, 2008Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
November 25, 2009Featured article reviewKept
December 28, 2015Featured topic candidatePromoted
April 13, 2017Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
April 13, 2018Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Cleanup Tag

[edit]

Do we agree or not that the legacy section needs a trim or rewrite? It’s a very famous game, and its legacy section should probably be long in the first place. Should we keep the tag, or remove it? Or Does someone want to rewrite the section? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:11, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alert some of the all-stars as well: @PresN:, @ProtoDrake:, @Tintor2:. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to have the same problems as some other Final Fantasy articles like "He was listed as most popular character in 2010. In 2012, he was listed as the most popular story, etc" using multiple quotes. It's kinda like the issue we had with Rinoa's article. Probably the best solution is writing something like "It has often been listed as one of the best games by Square and gaming in general" in order to provide generalizations over undue weight.Tintor2 (talk) 17:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The legacy section looked a little questionable. I decided to do a rewrite. As to the "Retrospective" section, I'd suggest doing some summarising and cutting the quotes, and that should fix the issue. --ProtoDrake (talk) 18:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely amazing, it’s fixed just like that. You are really gems of Wikipedians. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Dream oath opera" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dream oath opera. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 29#Dream oath opera until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 15:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Review table

[edit]

I feel that the review table is way too big, especially when only a handful of sources reviewed the other versions of the games. It should be limited to only the SNES version, in my opinion. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 05:11, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Release Date?

[edit]

Says "October 11, 1994". But I got this on my birthday in August of this year. So how is that possible? 185.85.155.35 (talk) 14:31, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Street dates" weren't kept to very strictly back then. August seems pretty early, though, seeing as all of the magazine reviews came out in the October/November issues. --PresN 18:55, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Final_Fantasy_VI&oldid=1296392507"