Talk:Emil Utitz
Appearance
![]() | Emil Utitz has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 28, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Emil Utitz appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 12:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
( )
- ... that the philosopher Emil Utitz, a classmate of Franz Kafka, became the head librarian of Theresienstadt Ghetto? Source: Wolfradt, Uwe; Billmann-Mahecha, Elfriede; Stock, Armin (2014-11-21). Deutschsprachige Psychologinnen und Psychologen 1933–1945: Ein Personenlexikon, ergänzt um einen Text von Erich Stern (in German). Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-658-01481-0.
- ALT1:... that the philosopher Emil Utitz was head librarian of Theresienstadt Ghetto and spent three months after the liberation there to oversee the disbanding of the library? Source: Miriam Intrator: ""People were literally starving for any kind of reading": The Theresienstadt Ghetto Central Library, 1942-1945" https://muse.jhu.edu/article/213101
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Emily Sinclair
- Comment: Unfortunately I can't find a free image.
Moved to mainspace by Kusma (talk). Self-nominated at 21:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC).
. Excellent, superbly sourced article. Tragic, deeply affecting story. No copyright issues, nommed the day it was moved to mainspace, hook cited, QPQ done. I can access doi:10.1353/lib.2007.0009 and the complete text of the biographical dictionary cited for the Kafka part but am mildly AGFing on the "classmate of Kafka" bit because I don't read German (but I do see Kafka referenced on the page, and Google tells me "zusammen" means "together"). I prefer alt0 and might actually delete the Kafka bit because it blunts the effect of the statement that there was a librarian at Theresienstadt. Your choice. Also, how are Nazi propaganda films not in the public domain??? AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 16:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review, glad you like it. For Kafka, there's also this class photograph to prove it (Utitz middle of the front row, Kafka second from left in the top row). The propaganda films might belong to (the heirs of) the people who were forced to make them, so under that assumption will be copyrighted until 70 years after their deaths. —Kusma (talk) 21:28, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Additional sources
[edit]- https://archive.org/details/terezin0000vari/mode/2up
- https://archive.org/details/expressionismrea0000unse/page/120/mode/2up?q=utitz
- https://archive.org/details/asifitwerelifeww0000mane/page/154/mode/2up?q=utitz
—Kusma (talk) 12:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Emil Utitz/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Kusma (talk · contribs) 17:53, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 12:33, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
I'll take this review. Comments to follow within the next few days. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:33, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
General comments
[edit]- Lead could be more thorough and not just a series of dates. Could cover his philosophical work or his work in Theresienstadt in more detail.
- Otherwise, really good prose, aside from one typo which I fixed. Will do a source spotcheck later for the remaining criteria. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:14, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- You are absolutely right about the lead, it should be about twice the length and discuss more aspects of his life. Will fix soon. —Kusma (talk) 18:00, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- Expanded a bit (I am not good at writing leads). Let me know if you would like me to include anything else. —Kusma (talk) 21:10, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- You are absolutely right about the lead, it should be about twice the length and discuss more aspects of his life. Will fix soon. —Kusma (talk) 18:00, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- Spotchecks passed, albeit of course one might have missed something in auto-German-translations. All good here. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:58, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Philosophy and religion good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class Czech Republic articles
- Low-importance Czech Republic articles
- All WikiProject Czech Republic pages
- GA-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- GA-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles