Jump to content

Talk:Curtis Burrow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Curtis Burrow/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 01:21, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 14:07, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I'll do this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:07, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

[edit]
  • the 1986 NFL draft, but was released on August 18, 1986 comma isn't needed
  • He signed with the Cincinnati Bengals on February 5, 1987, but then was released by them on May 8, 1987. comma isn't needed and I would drop "then"
  • initially returned in 1988, but was released on July 19, 1989, do you mean July 19, 1988?
    • "initially returned" should have said "in 1989".
  • Multiple sources mention that he was signed by the Packers because of his leg strength and ability to consistently kick-off for touchbacks. I think this should be added.
  • References:
    • All appear consistently formatted and reliable for what is being cited
    • Will you go through and remove duplicate inline citations in consecutive sentences?
    • Spot checks: within only 9 references, I checked them all.

Nice work! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:18, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]

5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 356 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:01, 5 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]