Draft:Pramod Deo
| Submission declined on 27 July 2025 by Fade258 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 26 July 2025 by RangersRus (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by RangersRus 4 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 26 July 2025 by Thilsebatti (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Thilsebatti 4 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 25 July 2025 by RangersRus (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by RangersRus 5 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 25 July 2025 by Qcne (talk). Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include: Declined by Qcne 5 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined. The reviewer(s) who declined this submission will be listed in the page history. | |
Comment: Ref 2 is a Primary source which is not sufficient to establish notability. It also lacks significant coverage about the subject. Please add secondary and independent references to the subject. Fade258 (talk) 01:20, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: YouTube videos with subject talking/interview is not secondary independent reliable source. RangersRus (talk) 13:15, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Pramod Deo is an Indian energy economist, regulator, and former civil servant who was appointed chairperson of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission in June 2008 after a vacancy of nearly a year.[1] He previously served as member and later chairperson of the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC), where he influenced significant tariff reforms in the state.[2]
Publications
[edit]According to a 2021 article in Powerline magazine, Pramod Deo has authored multiple books over three decades, reflecting India’s renewable energy trajectory including Decentralised Energy Planning: Methodology and Case Studies (1991), based on his early work with the Maharashtra Energy Development Agency[3]and Strategic Management of Energy Conservation (1993), associated with his leadership in energy conservation institutions.[3] His most recent work, Renewable Energy in India: Economics and Market Dynamics (2021), co-authored with Sushanta Chatterjee and Shrikant Modak, is published by SAGE India.[4]
See also
[edit]- Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission
- Electricity sector in India
References
[edit]- ^ Thakkar (10 July 2008). "Power cut at regulatory boards". The Economic Times. Retrieved 25 July 2025.
- ^ "Previous Members – MERC". Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission. Retrieved 25 July 2025.
- ^ a b Deo (27 September 2021). "Shift in Strategy: Examining the auction design and approach for the renewable energy market". Powerline. Retrieved 26 July 2025.
- ^ Deo, Pramod (2021). "Renewable Energy in India: Economics and Market Dynamics". SAGE Publications. Retrieved 26 July 2025.