Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Photography

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Photography and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 3 months

Wrong screen size

Visible presentation of misleading content

Canon EOS 7D Mark II (right) has a 3.0" LCD screen and the Canon EOS R5 Mark II (left) is currently described as also having a 3.0" screen.

Canon EOS R6 (right) has a 3.2" LCD screen and the Canon EOS R5 Mark II (left) is currently described as also having a 3.0" screen.

My Canon EOS R5 Mark II has a visibly larger LCD screen than my Canon EOS R6, but the infobox says otherwise.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@D-Kuru and Kicar2:-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You could find a reliable source for the screen size, and alter it yourself. -Lopifalko (talk) 16:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am calling in the experts. I see 3.2" and 2.95" as the first two results. I think it has to be 3.3 if the R6 is 3.2.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page states 3.2. Can you turn the screens on and compare active screen sizes? Kicar2 (talk) 23:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All the information I added was taken from the manufacturer's website. Under "specs" it says here: "LCD Screen [...] Monitor Size: 3.0-inch (screen aspect ratio of 3:2), 2.95 in./7.5cm diagonal (2.44 in./6.2cm width, 1.65 in./4.2cm height)". As I don't have this cutie right now, I can't even compare it to my R5. --D-Kuru (talk) 17:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear from the pictures how much bezel there is to each screen of the cameras mentioned here. The R6 and R5 Mark II fold out screens might look the same size, but have different sized bezels and so different sized LCDs. The 7D Mark II screen seems to have a very slim bezel. Kicar2 (talk) 22:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

Hello,
Please note that Image, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
_{Delivered by — MusikBot ^talk 00:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team}[reply]

Good article reassessment for Treats!

Treats! has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:45, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Red-eye effect

In order to prevent further edit warring, I've opened a discussion at Talk:Red-eye effect#Image to determine which image should be used to showcase the effect in the lede. Thanks. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lens cover

Please add reliable sources to this stub. Bearian (talk) 22:58, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Réhahn

Article-subject's representative is unhappy with article content. If you have an opinion, please join the talkpage discussion. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 05:42, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]