 WikiProject Turkey
Departments
Infoboxes
Other templates
Turkey work groups
Project's statistics
This list is generated automatically every night around 10 PM EST; view full worklist
| Turkey articles by quality and importance
|
| Quality
|
Importance
|
| Top
|
High
|
Mid
|
Low
|
NA
|
???
|
Total
|
 FA
|
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
|
|
14
|
| FL
|
1
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
 A
|
|
|
4
|
1
|
|
|
5
|
 GA
|
1
|
8
|
40
|
82
|
|
11
|
142
|
| B
|
25
|
68
|
248
|
270
|
1
|
89
|
701
|
| C
|
28
|
88
|
396
|
909
|
|
348
|
1,769
|
| Start
|
10
|
115
|
2,075
|
5,116
|
1
|
2,203
|
9,520
|
| Stub
|
|
6
|
449
|
20,699
|
|
7,083
|
28,237
|
| List
|
1
|
15
|
310
|
385
|
34
|
400
|
1,145
|
| Category
|
|
|
|
|
13,767
|
|
13,767
|
| Disambig
|
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
589
|
| File
|
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
191
|
| Portal
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
18
|
| Project
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
16
|
| Redirect
|
1
|
15
|
88
|
410
|
1,211
|
|
1,725
|
| Template
|
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
1,397
|
| NA
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
| Other
|
|
|
|
1
|
76
|
|
77
|
| Assessed
|
67
|
319
|
3,615
|
27,883
|
17,302
|
10,134
|
59,320
|
| Unassessed
|
|
|
2
|
9
|
|
1,209
|
1,220
|
| Total
|
67
|
319
|
3,617
|
27,892
|
17,302
|
11,343
|
60,540
|
| WikiWork factors (?)
|
ω = 226,367
|
Ω = 5.61
|
WikiProject Turkey
Article Improvement Drives[edit]- There is a need for standardisation of same kind of articles; i.e. City articles have many different layouts, Biographies, Geographic places, cuisine related, music related also.
- We must have a definite layout for Provinces, another one for cities, another one for mountains, another one for ministries and so on.
- A sample Layout for Provinces; Wikipedia:WikiProject Turkey/Current tasks/layout/province
- Comments and ideas needed. .
Tagging the talk pages of articles with {{WPTR}} puts them in project scope and identifies them via various categories to the project.
- New articles - New articles that may be relevant to WikiProject Turkey should be reviewed daily and any new articles that are in project scope should be tagged.
- Turkey-stubs - These are articles tagged on the main page as a stub article related to Turkey. These should be brought into project scope.
- Data - Category:Turkey stubs
- Frequency - Quarterly
- Taskforce
- Task - All the articles in this category should have {{WPTR|class=Stub|importance=}}
- Result - Turkey-stubs ranked as Stub-Class within WPTR, stubs that have progressed have stub-tags removed, Stub-Class articles wrongly classified as something else re-ranked to Stub-Class.
- Can be automated - YES All tasks aside from re-ranking either to Stub-Class or having main article stub tag removed can be automated.
- Last done: (Add date when this task was last carried out)
- Turkey-cuisine-stubs - These are articles tagged on the main page as a stub article related to cuisine of Turkey. These should be brought into project scope and also to the attention of Food and Drink Project
- Data - Category:Turkish cuisine stubs
- Frequency - Quarterly
- Taskforce
- Task - All the articles in this category should have {{WPTR|class=Stub|importance=}} {{WikiProject Food and Drink}}
- Result - Turkey-cuisine-stubs ranked as Stub-Class within WPTR, and made known to Food and Drink project, stubs that have progressed have stub-tags removed, Stub-Class articles wrongly classified as something else re-ranked to Stub-Class.
- Can be automated - YES All tasks aside from re-ranking either to Stub-Class or having main article stub tag removed can be automated.
- Last done: (Add date when this task was last carried out)
- Needed articles
- Please tag any redlink articles talk page with ;{{WPTR}} , "class=Needed" . These links will be automatically listed under the category in above link.
Hi everybody,
could someone take a look at this little problem here? The thing is that some statistics about Muslim/Turkish(?) casualties are wrongly cited from sources, but now two editors are simply removing the category of Muslim casualties altogether, leaving only Greek and Armenian figures. I am not sure, but I feel this might even be done on purpose, the editors do not engage in discussion, so some help would be appreciated. Thank you, 82.217.116.224 (talk) 09:42, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I managed to get a reprieve for this Turkish article into draftspace about a Turkish paper pulp company called MOPAK; however, I could not find enough RS to save it properly (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOPAK). There is very little on it in English websites. I was wondering if there are any Turkish editors who could take a look at it in draftspace and see if they can find some Turkish references that would help it meet WP:GNG? Otherwise, it will get deleted in draftspace. Or perhaps, Turkish editors might not consider it worth saving? Britishfinance (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Publicising this - Talk:Good Party#Political position - Rfc here, per WP:RFCTP. It really needs input from more editors. Please place your views on the linked talk page. Thanks. Helper201 (talk) 13:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|
