Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

22 June 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< June 21	June 23 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Emiliano Vargas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not meet WP:NBOX HumanRight 01:24, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sport of athletics-related deletion discussions. HumanRight 01:24, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Boxing, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:32, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Doesn't yet appear to meet WP:NBOX or WP:GNG. At best it appears to be WP:TOOSOON for an article on him, although perhaps a mention of him could be made in his father's article. Papaursa (talk) 17:12, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:39, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Houston Oldham

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails to meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT because of a lack of significant coverage. Let'srun (talk) 03:25, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Tennessee, and Virginia. Let'srun (talk) 03:25, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sandor Bustamante

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails to meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun (talk) 03:21, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Virginia, and Washington, D.C.. Let'srun (talk) 03:21, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

João Barrento

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails to meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT because of a lack of WP:SIGCOV. The only sources are primary or do not provide significant coverage of the subject. Let'srun (talk) 03:14, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Military, Olympics, and Portugal. Let'srun (talk) 03:14, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Šipajlo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT because of a lack of WP:SIGCOV. The only sources are databases, and all I could find elsewhere was [[1]], which isn't significant, and [[2]], which is only a mention. Let'srun (talk) 02:51, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Czech Republic. Let'srun (talk) 02:51, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sho Nogami

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not meet WP:NBOX HumanRight 02:43, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sport of athletics-related deletion discussions. HumanRight 02:43, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:11, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:11, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:11, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zaya Younan

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a re-creation of a previous article deleted in June 2017. Still fails WP:N and subsequently WP:BIO. The references provided all rely on promotional interviews and cannot be considered as independent of the subject. As the CEO of Younan Properties, he should not inherit any notability solely from the business he owns and runs. Loopy30 (talk) 02:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Loopy30 (talk) 02:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:13, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:14, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:14, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Lyn Ray

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject requests deletion per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE in ticket:2025061110007843 VRT ticket. Identity has been verified. Sources are also too less for WP:NAUTHOR in any case. I think we can consider the subject's request for deletion, since they have not been highly covered in reliable independent sources. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:18, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Women. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:18, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arkansas and Louisiana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:29, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. "Sources are also too less for WP:NAUTHOR in any case" is not true, neither is "not been highly covered in reliable independent sources". Since I refuted the claims in the deprod statement, I hadn't expected to see them repeated here. My reasoning was that Ray has a whopping 23 reviews on Kirkus Reviews alone, [3] inferring that there are more via other outlets. This is coverage in reliable independent sources. Seems like a prolific, widely read and indeed profiled author. Perhaps we can omit the biographical details and listify it as a bibliography. The works/body of work are unquestionably notable. Geschichte (talk) 15:34, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Geschichte inferring that there are more via other outlets: I do not think that is a great argument though. As far as I know, that is one of the very few websites that have these in depth significant reviews. (please ping on reply) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 16:04, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Bunnypranav's statements above are misleading and I question the effort that was made in reaching the conclusions. There are also several reviews here, at least five more in Publishers' Weekly, some in New York Times, made an appearance on the NYT top 10 bestseller list for children etc. The author has a homepage with an autobiographical account, etc. Geschichte (talk) 20:40, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the subject's request. If they are notable, they're not so notable that we have to keep the article. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 01:29, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the refs provided by Geschichte. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:52, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, in addition to the sources provided above, there are reviews in more specialized outlets like Horn Book [4][5], School Library Journal [6][7][8], and Education Week [9]. I think the preponderance of reviews clearly shows notability per WP:NAUTHOR criteria #3, despite the subject's deletion request. Bridget (talk) 20:33, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:14, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anish Shah (Businessman)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Business person does business things. None of the refs provide WP:SIGCOV, subject fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:36, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Business, and India. UtherSRG (talk) 11:36, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:56, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest in this article, Anish Shah qualifies under WP:GNG, as he's the CEO of Mahindra group which is in India's top 25 companies. And he has significant coverage in reliable, independent sources as far as I researched after founding this article via Special:Random/Draft.

So I will improve this article asap to follow the Wikipedia:GNG completly. and kindly explain this- Business person does business things so I can know what wrong I did in this so I can improve that also. iVickyChoudhary (talk) 15:31, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And the previous CEO of the same company has very old wiki article. Anand Mahindra Just sharing. I know it doesn't matter much. iVickyChoudhary (talk) 15:32, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@IVickyChoudhary: Being connected to a notable entity does not grant notability per WP:INHERIT. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:06, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree that notability is not inherited by association per Wikipedia:INHERIT. However, the argument for keeping this article is not based solely on Anish Shah’s role at Mahindra Group, but on his own notability, which is independently established through. Multiple reliable and independent sources that provide significant coverage of his leadership, strategic decisions, and business vision as Managing Director and CEO of Mahindra Group. Kindly search on Google about him. iVickyChoudhary (talk) 06:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References say he's a businessperson doing business things. That's not SIGCOV. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:11, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your review. While I understand the concern that "businessperson doing business things" doesn't automatically imply notability, I respectfully argue that Anish Shah meets the WP:SIGCOV, and WP:GNG.

He has received significant coverage in independent, reliable sources such as Forbes India, Economic Times, and Business Today, which profile his leadership, strategic direction, and impact at Mahindra Group. This coverage goes beyond routine job announcements, it reflects independent journalistic interest in Shah as an individual business leader, not merely in the company he leads. His coverage is not trivial, routine, or tied to a single event. I will continue to improve the article by adding more sources that fulfill WP:SIGCOV and will restructure the article to reflect their depth and focus. iVickyChoudhary (talk) 07:58, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - "Business person does business things" … and on a global scale in ~~Choudhary's~~ Shah's case. Mahindra Group is huge ($23 billion plus). There are Mahindra tractor dealers in farming towns across North America. I'd be stunned if ~~Choudhary~~ Shah isn't notable. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 01:43, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@A. B.: You mean Shah, right? - UtherSRG (talk) 02:10, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ooops! Yes. Thanks. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 02:14, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:13, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Juan de Landa (bobsleigh)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV needed to meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT. The only source is a database and I was unable to find any WP:SIGCOV to meet the notability guidelines in a BEFORE. Let'srun (talk) 02:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Sports, Olympics, and Mexico. Let'srun (talk) 02:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Past Sharks squads

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NLIST and WP:GNG. We don't keep lists like this. Readers who may be interested in previous players can see historic players at List of Sharks (rugby union) players, transfer lists for URC and Super Rugby competitions and season pages. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 13:04, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Rugby union, Sportspeople and South Africa. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 13:26, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not opposed to merging this with the List of Sharks (rugby union) players, subject to resolution of the distinction of Currie Cup vs URC players, as if those players - who meet notability requirements - are excluded then List of Sharks (rugby union) players is incomplete. Whybeetoo (talk) 11:04, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This would be dependent on the outcome of the discussion on the WikiProject. I'd be opposed to full squad boxes but if we can find information on Currie Cup players (which I found incredibly difficult in creating this list) then can be added in another section if consensus reached. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:53, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:05, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kingsley Wilson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While I have no doubt in the reliability of references provided in the article, this subject does not look notable to me for several reasons. She has only been in office since January, with there being little coverage of her life and career, particularly because there does not seem to be significant coverage of that in reliable sources (as it can be seen, the references only briefly pass over what she has actually done in her life and instead concentrate on her political beliefs). As far as I'm aware, an official is not presumed to be notable only based on their political beliefs (most of this article is actually related to that instead of her short career). This then might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, where a politician could become notable in the future for their career accomplishments, and not instead of their political views. To close this off, there is coverage of this person in reliable sources independent of the subject but is this coverage "significant"? We could write a ton more articles like this where there's news coverage of someone's political beliefs, but little to none about what they have accomplished. I should also note that while the creator of this article has expanded several major articles to B-status which is sure appreciated, they were previously banned from creating articles in the mainspace and instead had to use the AfC system. This is one of the articles created since the ban expired in April. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and United States of America. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, yes that is significant coverage. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 03:44, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
how so? Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 11:47, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:SIGCOV, I think you've confused significant coverage with coverage of what you think is significant... Your argument doesn't make any sense otherwise. Significant coverage of political beliefs counts just as much towards notability as significant coverage of political accomplishments. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Other than WP:TOOSOON, I would argue independently of that, she is not notable. Most of the sources were published at the same time so there is no demonstration of sustained coverage. The citations from the end of May are redundant. existence ≠ notability. There is a lot of masking a lack of notability. The article lists every job she's ever held. A vague position at Gettr for an unlisted amount of time is not encyclopedic. The sourcing is also misapplied. For example, the statement that she was sworn in on May 27th does not appear in the Forward despite the citation. Again, adding references to mask a lack of notability.--Mpen320 (talk) 18:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Kingsley, and some of her commentary, have received significant coverage from major sources in the short time she had been in the public eye. This coverage is only likely to grow, although I believe she is notable now. As a side note, the article is pretty well-written too. CarlStrokes (talk) 17:46, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:02, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kerman, Mazandaran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NGEO, non-notable village in Iran. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 16:00, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Iran. Shellwood (talk) 16:46, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is currently being addressed. I'm trying to collect as much information possible to make sure it can considered notable.PAper GOL (talk) 17:33, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The relevant criteria here are explained in WP:GEOLAND: Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can be notable, because notability encompasses their entire history. It is a little concerning that a couple of the reference links appear to be broken but if it is in fact a populated, legally recognized place, the article will likely pass. Cielquiparle (talk) 05:27, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A great part of articles are random villages. This is because the objective is to cover every village in the world. This should be kept no matter what. Earth605 (talk) 17:05, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:02, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

leaning keep It does look like a village on GMaps, but there is a history of the Iranian census being misrepresented. Could we get confirmation from a Farsi speaker? Mangoe (talk) 19:41, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to address the WPV issues
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:02, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Devons Road DLR station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing on the page to suggest there are sufficient independent RS to meet the inclusion criteria. WP:NTRAINSTATION WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt (talk) 09:36, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and England. JMWt (talk) 09:36, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (expecting snowball keep frankly). Just because there are no sources on the article does not mean they do not exist. MRSC (talk) 09:43, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
if you could suggest some relevant sources that meet the standards for inclusion that would be great. Thanks. JMWt (talk) 09:49, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:09, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see a few book sources in the article. Have you verified that the offline sources also do not provide SIGCOV? Generally active British railway stations are kept at AfD because of the offline sourcing. Jumpytoo Talk 21:13, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Plenty of sourcing available. Vast amounts have been written about all stations in the UK. Satisfies WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:10, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: for a source assessment
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:57, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Otto Rottman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks the WP:SIGCOV needed to meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT. The only sources here are in order (1): a database and (2): doesn't mention the subject. Let'srun (talk) 01:52, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Romania. Let'srun (talk) 01:52, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BIG SHOT

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, and if you want to go further into subject-specific areas, WP:NSONG. Checking all of the sources in use in the article at the moment, none of them provide significant coverage regarding "BIG SHOT" itself, or are WP:VALNET sources - which cannot be used to establish notability. Some of the sources, like the GamesRadar+ and India Times cite, don't mention the song at all. A WP:BEFORE search doesn't turn up anything different, either - running the song through WP:VG/SE or WP:A/S's search engine doesn't turn up any substantial results, actually. Should be redirected back to Music of Deltarune#Deltarune Chapter 2 OST. λ NegativeMP1 01:44, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Video games. λ NegativeMP1 01:44, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Per WP:OVERLAP. Even if it was notable, it's better described in context. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:55, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Octagon, Indiana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I can tell, this was nothing more than a long-lived 4th class post office. I find no evidence for a town here; several people in a vounty history are listed as "from" here, but they are all described as farmers. Mangoe (talk) 01:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:15, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:15, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appleby Court

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not demonstrated. Google search returns only estate agent listings of apartments in the building. The two sources only describe it in passing (where the first link can be found on The Internet Archive}. Tæppa (talk) 00:30, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Tæppa (talk) 00:30, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:16, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sacha Dragic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear notability. Current sources appear routine and more focused on this person's company than him. I am not sure that he meets notability guidelines as a WP:BUSINESSPERSON. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 00:10, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, France, Romania, and Serbia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks near Dobrosin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the article fails WP:V; the part dealing with the attacks themselves. The article states that "the LAPMB took control over Dobrosin, Lučane, Končulj, Mali Trnovac and Breznica, as well as 4 police stations", but the sources cited, BBC and Večernje novosti say nothing about that. The BBC source reports on a ceasefire and short summary of the events leading up to it, while the Večernje novosti article is from 2012 and reports the arrests of Albanians related to the war by Serbian authorities. They make no mention of three members of the MUP being killed and five wounded in the first ambush (the BBC does however confirm four casualties and several wounded in the presumably second attack mentioned in the article).

The article also says that "Special Police Units from Gornji Milanovac were forced to withdraw to Konculj, Lučane and Bujanovac" but the Yugoslav survey book has no page number or quote to verify, and the other citation is inaccessible. The rest of the paragraph is unsourced. Griboski (talk) 23:43, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Kosovo, and Yugoslavia. Shellwood (talk) 23:57, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 22. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:07, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article most definitely fails WP:V, alongside other listed problems. — Sadko (words are wind) 00:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Rhode Island Senate District 4 special election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's been my understanding that state legislative special elections in the U.S. are not inherently notable. See, for example, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Oklahoma State Senate special election. I don't see anything in this article that would suggest this particular special election rises above any other of the dozens of other state legislative specials that happen every year. I'd support a redirect to 2025 United States state legislative elections#Rhode Island. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 00:05, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Rhode Island. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:13, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

obvious redirect as argued in nom. Mangoe (talk) 01:11, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep statewide coverage as seen in the Rhode Island Current [10] [11], and other various outlets from a google search. Boston Globe, as well as coverage of a committee endorsement. May not be properly cited in article but is perfectly notable as a standalone page. Just because state legislative specials are not inherently notable does not mean that they are not. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:48, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]