This page contains an automatically-generated list of reviews that are unanswered. This list is compiled automatically by detecting reviews that have not been edited at all after their initial creation.
Because of this, this list won't identify reviews which have been subsequently edited. Though such reviews are still displayed in full on the peer review main page, peer reviews that haven't been reviewed and aren't listed here can be added here.
The peer review list on this page is automatically generated. Please follow the steps on the instructions page to add or remove a review.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it to featured article status, but I am unsure about the structure, tone, flow, content, or other aspects. I’d really appreciate any feedback on the article as a whole, Thanks, Lililolol (talk) 20:20, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looking to potentially nominate this article for FA sometime in the future. I've already helped promote this article and Mario Party: Island Tour to GA, and I believe that the former is stronger in terms of reliable sourcing, citation amounts, etc. I previously requested a peer review for Yoshi's New Island, and I found it helpful to hear from a user unfamiliar with video game terminology. It would also be helpful to track down some international responses to the game; I've tried Famitsu without success. Any advice is appreciated!
I've listed this article for peer review because I would love for this article to pass FA review the next time around. I feel as though it has improved greatly in my 16-hour editing marathon but I need more opinions.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it to GA, and if possible FA (FA seems like a bit of a stretch considering I have never gotten one before).
I've listed this article for peer review because I want a review of copyediting or grammar issues, which was the main reason for the first GAN's quick fail. Previously, I have requested a copyedit, and it was partially done. But, since English is not my native language, I would like to submit a peer review before submitting another GAN.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want this article to be my first featured article candidate. The topic covered in the article (currently a GA) is not known to many people, but to enthusiasts it may be considerably interesting. The religion of the Shang is a complex one, and this article alone cannot describe the whole of it. I was desperate to make it both comprehensive and understandable to readers at the same time, but I'm running out of ideas for further article development.
I'm mostly concerned with the sourcing of the article. Although they are not the majority, Ph.D dissertations are used within some sections. I've given Wikipedia:SCHOLARSHIP a decent look, but I'm still not sure whether the cited dissertations are valid as reliable sources. Besides, I feel that Wikipedia prefers books to journal articles, so whether my mixed reference list of book and journals is allowed is also a thing I want to know.
Another problem for me is whether the article has covered enough information. For a small religion like this, it's of great importance to me to know what can be added to the main prose. I think the sections about Shang beliefs and practices are broad enough because I devote most of the time to these. But there remain questions when it comes to political influence and history of the religion. If there's something I should improve, please let me know.
Finally, if my article doesn't satisfy certain MOS rules, I'd like to be reminded about this.
I've listed this article for peer review to prepare it for a featured article candidacy. I would be interested to learn what changes are required to fulfill the featured article criteria, but I'm also open to more casual improvement ideas.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'm looking for guidance on how to restructure the article to improve flow, coherence and readability. I'm also looking for guidance on what editing can be undertaken to resolve the maintenance tags.
I've listed this article for peer review because as a participant in WikiProject Spain this will surely help with its FL status nomination that I want to propose.
