Wikipedia:Peer review/Luna (Feid and ATL Jacob song)/archive3

Luna (Feid and ATL Jacob song)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because I want a review on prose, and maybe language on this article before re-nominating to FAC. Thanks, Santi (talk) 00:24, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up, you're only allowed to request one article to be peer reviewed. Erick (talk) 07:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Magiciandude@Magiciandude: Thanks. During the day, I'll close the other review temporarily. Santi (talk) 12:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Santi, the article is going to need more than a peer review to meet the standards of FA. I would strongly suggest seeking somebody fluent in English to directly rewrite the prose and maybe co-nominating with them. The PR would be more beneficial when just a few finishing touches are required.--N Ø 17:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MaranoFan: Oh, holy fvck. So, what I have to do to co-nominate by then? Santi (talk) 22:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can make a request at WP:GOCER for someone to copyedit it. Make sure to point out its for FAC. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 16:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tarlby: I had tried before, but the copy-editor did not fix prose nor grammar. I do not think it is a good idea to try again. Santi (talk) 13:48, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it'd be worth another try. Note explicitly that you want the prose and grammar improved. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 15:30, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re-opening

This article was already copy-edited. @Erick; @MaranoFan; @Tarlby (the last mention is just in case): Is this better now? Santi (talk) 00:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FAC PR sidebar

@Pollosito: I have added this article to the FAC PR review sidebar. Please consider reviewing articles listed there, and remove your entry when this is closed. I highly recommend that you also review articles at WP:FAC now: this will help you learn the FA criteria and build goodwill among FAC reviewers, making it more likely that your article will be reviewed. Z1720 (talk) 15:02, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: Thank you so much. Santi (talk) 19:14, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Here'll be some of my comments. Arconning (talk) 15:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Arconning: Almost all comments addressed. I will research how to do the brief description for accolades. Santi (talk) 19:01, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Feid, ATL Jacob - Luna.png - Fair Use, makes sense
File:ATL Jacob.png - CC BY 3.0
- Alt-text is present and all have proper licensing, proper captioning, and are relevant to the article.
As this is an English language article, wouldn't it be more appropriate for a "translation" template (transl. "Moon") instead of (English: "Moon")?
Could some prose be supplied for the Accolades section? Just some brief descriptions.
","Luna" is three ", misplaced comma.
The song being certified diamond in Central America could be included in the lead.