Jump to content

Wikipedia:Peer review/Kitamura Sae/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've listed this article for peer review because I want a review of copyediting or grammar issues, which was the main reason for the first GAN's quick fail. Previously, I have requested a copyedit, and it was partially done. But, since English is not my native language, I would like to submit a peer review before submitting another GAN.

Thanks, Saimmx (talk) 19:53, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042

[edit]
  • There are a few more issues too. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:05, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I am trying to familiarise myself with the notability of an independence list, which looks more lenient than the Chinese one, so it takes time to split her work.
    And, I would like to ask why podcasts done by TBS Radio in the article are still unreliable? I know the WP:SPS guide said podcasts are unreliable because it is close to self-publish, but the podcast in the article is done by TBS Radio, a mass media group in Japan. Do they still unreliable? Is Today in Focus by The Guardian are unreliable here as well? Saimmx (talk) 10:25, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I apologise for the podcast point I did not realise that TBS was a major company. I retract the podcast statement. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:22, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Update: I have done most of them, but still some tricky tasks:
    • Japanese translation: I tried my best to do it, but most of works were only published in Japan.
    • Too many references: Its original entry has, actually, over a hundred of citations. Even though I have kill one in third, looks like it is still not enough.
    Saimmx (talk) 19:04, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • All Japanese text should use a template.
  • All Japanese text should have a translation in said template.
  • There are many harv warnings and errors that need to be fixed, I would suggest installing User talk:Trappist the monk's tool to find these.
  • There are far too many references for the text.
  • Most of the page should be split of into a different called, List of works by Sae Kitamura or something similar.
  • Podcasts are not reliable sources and should be removed.

Copyedit section

  • "British literature and literary critic" -> "British literature and a literary critic"
  • "Lecturer and Associate Professor" -> "lecturer and associate professor"
  • "and published in The Hokkaido Shimbun Press" -> "and was published in The Hokkaido Shimbun Press"
  • "was ranked 18th in the" -> "was ranked 18th in"
  • "As Wikipedian" -> "As a Wikipedian"
  • "2016 conference of the The History of Science Society of Japan" -> "2016 conference of the History of Science Society of Japan"