Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Scott Carson/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:29, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Article has 11 citation needed tags (at the time of posting) , so probably passes meets the quick-fail criteria. The good article review was also around 16 years ago. TNM101 (chat) 05:35, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Surprisingly enough for a promotion this old, I don't see any glaring issues in the version that was reviewed and given GA status. But that was over 1,000 revisions ago, and the current article does not meet our standards. The CN tags appear valid, and honestly the article's organization isn't great either with excessive sectioning and very short paragraphs. If this doesn't get improved, it should be delisted. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:56, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.