Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Philippe I, Duke of Orléans/2
Appearance
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:47, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Uncited statements, including the entire "Portrayals in media" section (tagged with an orange banner since February 2024). Z1720 (talk) 01:10, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Z1720: The issue has been resolved. JeBonSer (talk) 10:18, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- @JeBonSer: I have added citation needed templates for other statements that need citations. There are also some sources that area listed in the "Bibliography" that are not used as inline citations: should they be moved to "Further reading" or removed from the article?
- Carretier, Christian (1980).
- Hilton, Lisa (2002).
- Lurgo, Elisabetta (2018).
- Lurgo, Elisabetta (2018).
- Feel free to ping me when this is ready for a re-review or if there are any questions. Z1720 (talk) 13:27, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Z1720: I will add citations later and for the unused inline citations it's better to place them in the "Further reading" section. JeBonSer (talk) 15:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Z1720: All done. JeBonSer (talk) 13:07, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- @JeBonSer: I have added citation needed templates for other statements that need citations. There are also some sources that area listed in the "Bibliography" that are not used as inline citations: should they be moved to "Further reading" or removed from the article?
Visited the article today: it looks to me to be of GA standard, and I spotted no obvious uncited statements. If I were reviewing de novo now there are some comments I'd make, but I don't see any case for delisting. Tim riley talk 13:44, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Citation concerns and source concerns have been resolved. Z1720 (talk) 15:39, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.