Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ike Leggett/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:05, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
2009 listing; has several unsourced paragraphs (including one whole section). The lead is also likely too long relative to the size of the article. charlotte 👸♥ 06:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not sure this is sufficient address. However, it is worth noting that the original promotion did have a reference for the first section - to The Washington Post. I generally do not edit in politics and do not wish to start now - I really would have little idea what I was doing beyond the basics - but I did observe that the one source that cited the section (which in itself could be a problem) had been removed. From reading one thing or another, I thought I heard rumblings that there were situations where the Post was unacceptable in articles regarding politics. Would this be such a case? If not, it might be better than nothing at all. mftp dan oops 16:02, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- @MFTP Dan: If the Washington Post was the only reference for that section, and it has been removed, then I do not think this article would meet the GA criteria. I think for this to meet the criteria other sources would need to be found and referenced for that section. Z1720 (talk) 15:30, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
- To be fair, I'm not sure the source being removed was the correct decision. Regardless, there should be more than one for an entire section in a GA. Either way with one source I'm doubtful it meets the criteria. mftp dan oops 16:42, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
- @MFTP Dan: If the Washington Post was the only reference for that section, and it has been removed, then I do not think this article would meet the GA criteria. I think for this to meet the criteria other sources would need to be found and referenced for that section. Z1720 (talk) 15:30, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.