Wikipedia:Featured article review/Diocletianic Persecution/archive1
Diocletianic Persecution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Geuiwogbil, WikiProject Religion, WikiProject European history, WikiProject Christianity, WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, WikiProject Rome, WikiProject Sociology, WikiProject Discrimination, WikiProject Human rights, 2020-05-03 2025-05-31
Review section
[edit]This is the oldest article listed at WP:FARGIVEN, with concerns first brought up in 2020. Since then, some concerns have been resolved, some added, and some continue. Work seems to have stalled, so I think it is time to finally bring this article here to finalise fixing up the article and determine if it meets the FA criteria. Here are, from what I can gather, the remaining issues identified on the article's talk page:
- There are concerns that the article relies too heavily on primary sources. This concern was addressed, but I am not sure if it has been resolved.
- A couple uncited statements in the article,
- Large block quotes are frequently used in the article, which might go against WP:SS,
- The article, at over 10,000 words, is considered WP:TOOBIG. I think there is text that can be spun out or removed as too detailed from the article. WP:REDEX might help, as well as summarising quotes.
That's the list. Looking forward to reading editor thoughts. Z1720 (talk) 16:07, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Move to FARC no edits to address concerns. Z1720 (talk) 17:03, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and coverage. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:43, 19 July 2025 (UTC)