User talk:ZionistHater

March 2024

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, ZionistHater, does not comply with Wikipedia's username policy. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy, which is summarized here.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If your username is not in violation of Wikipedia's username policy, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 04:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note -- please specifically see the following section of username policy ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 04:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The following types of usernames are not permitted, and will be immediately blocked upon discovery, because they are disruptive or offensive:
Usernames that are likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption to productive Wikipedia processes or discussions, or make harmonious editing difficult or impossible to achieve; e.g. by containing profanities, or referencing highly contentious events or controversies.[1] Usernames that are blatantly profane, violent, threatening, or sexually explicit, or that advocate or encourage any such behavior (including acts that are deemed by most societies as either extremely immoral, criminal, or illegal). Usernames that deliberately offend, dehumanize, attack, demean, disparage, discriminate, or support or advocate any such behavior toward any race, religion, gender, sexual identity, sexual preference, political affiliation, or social group or status, or imply the intent to do so. Examples include: Usernames that contain discriminatory attacks, racial slurs, or pejorative terms
Usernames that praise highly contentious people, groups (also known as "hate groups"), or events - future, past, or present - that currently allocate or have allocated efforts or resources toward afflicting direct discriminatory, social, physical, or emotional harm toward those who identify as part of any of these groups.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ZionistHater (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Pizzalover56 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

ok I won't mention politics in my username ZionistHater (talk) 20:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See below. Drmies (talk) 20:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your edits. There is nothing there that suggests you have a knowledge of, or a desire to acquire a working knowledge of, our policies and what we do here. For starters, there's the matter of basing edits on reliable secondary sources. Drmies (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this block should be strengthened. I do not believe it would be appropriate to unblock this user and allow them to continue editing as they did before. It's hard to imagine what restrictions would work here to ensure constructive editing. --Yamla (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have zero objections to someone adjusting this to be a more permanent hard block. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok ZionistHater (talk) 02:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 20:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Off-wiki misconduct in Palestine–Israel topic area II

The Arbitration Committee has reviewed a dossier of "Tech4Palestine" Discord server related evidence and has determined that, as of this time, the concerns raised have been adequately addressed. The evidence has been retained by the Committee to be used, if necessary, to corroborate additional evidence received. The editors who were brought up in the report are:

Samisawtak (talk · contribs) - topic banned by ArbCom
Ïvana (talk · contribs) - banned by ArbCom
Tashmetu (talk · contribs) - EC revoked, warned for violating ECR
Isoceles-sai (talk · contribs) - Result of below
ZionistHater (talk · contribs) - Blocked as WP:NOTHERE by Drmies
Discourseofcourse (talk · contribs) - Blocked as WP:NOTHERE by Bbb23
Ummahrican (talk · contribs) - 2 edits 10 months ago - No action necessary, can be addressed if they return
Ronnie_larko (talk · contribs) - 218 edits, last edit 4 months ago - No action necessary, can be addressed if they return
Sarachicad (talk · contribs) - 32 edits, last edit 10 months ago - No action necessary, can be addressed if they return
WamelSlice (talk · contribs) - 8 edits, last edit 8 months ago - No action necessary, can be addressed if they return
Rw29014life (talk · contribs) - 12 edits, last edit 11 months ago - No action necessary, can be addressed if they return
HadyaWaqfi (talk · contribs) - 1 deleted edit 8 months ago - No action necessary, can be addressed if they return
ToTell3Truth (talk · contribs) - 1 edit 11 months ago - No action necessary, can be addressed if they return
Shushugah (talk · contribs) - No evidence of misbehavior
Baderdean (talk · contribs) - Edits fr.wiki, ArbCom has no jurisdiction

The Committee has been provided additional evidence of off-wiki coordination independent of the Tech4Palestine Discord server. As a result the committee has passed the following motions:

For violations of Wikipedia's policies on Wikipedia:Canvassing and off-wiki coordination, Isoceles-sai (talk · contribs) is banned from the English Wikipedia.

Support: Aoidh, Cabayi, CaptainEek, Daniel, Elli, KrakatoaKatie, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, ToBeFree, Theleekycauldron

Oppose:

Abstain:

For violations of Wikipedia's policies on Wikipedia:Canvassing and off-wiki coordination, GeoColdWater (talk · contribs) is banned from the English Wikipedia.

Support: Aoidh, Cabayi, CaptainEek, Daniel, Elli, KrakatoaKatie, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, ToBeFree, Theleekycauldron

Oppose:

Abstain:

The committee encourages the community to continue to provide any private evidence of off-wiki coordination to the committee via email.

For the Arbitration Committee, CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 03:59, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Off-wiki misconduct in Palestine–Israel topic area II