Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Palumbo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Yvy70!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:36, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I am writing about the rejection of Michael Palumbo's biographical page. I apologize for my imperfect understanding of all the issues related to the question, I am not a native English speaker. I would like to understand, if possible, which parts - the text is not very long - if they exist, to eliminate/modify/integrate in order to have it accepted. Thank you Yvy70 (talk) 23:24, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I declined the first time it was submitted when you just had three sources (the first being a partially readable bad image) that did not show notability in my view and also most of the content appeared unsourced. I see the latest version has more sources. You will have to ask the later reviewers to explain the decline reason they gave. I would not have reviewed as too many of the sources are poor images of articles in Italian which I only have very basic knowledge of so I could not fairly review. So ask the last reviewer, or ask at the help desk - you will find links in the last decline notice to the help desk and the reviewers talk page. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 21:38, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Palumbo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Palumbo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
