User talk:Treat3034231

March 2025

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Filipinos in China, you may be blocked from editing. If you want to introduce a change to the article you must have reliable sources backing up your claims. Reverting edits en masse will achieve nothing. SigillumVert (talk) 19:49, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Filipinos in China, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:52, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll note that you were the first to remove that content without an explanation. Such content removal is usually summarily reverted unless you can give a valid reason. If you don't explain the edit we cannot tell if it is a legitimate edit or vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:57, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also please discuss matters on talk pages rather than engaging in an edit war. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:00, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Filipinos in China. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:03, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit in OOCL

Hey, in case you are not aware, your change steps on some pretty contentious topics... So please be mindful of this the next time you do do such changes ;) Cheers, —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 03:10, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]