Talk:Filipinos in China
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Filipinos in China article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Filipinos in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629174514/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/stdn/std/Weekend/FI18Dk10.html to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/stdn/std/Weekend/FI18Dk10.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Inclusion of Hong Kong section
[edit]@Treat3034231 and SigillumVert: You two are edit warring across multiple articles, including this one. I am requesting that both of you stop reverting and stop accusing each other of vandalism and work things out here. Treat3034231, as I said on your talk page, removing content without explaining why in an edit summary is usually reverted since it is not clear if the edit is legitimate. SigillumVert's reverts are not vandalism. On the flip side, Treat3034231 has now explained their reasoning with this edit. The removal may be disruptive, but it is not vandalism. So none of the edits here are an exception to the WP:3RR. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:19, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Well, Filipinos in Hong Kong are Filipinos in China. The user posits his reasoning on a faulty premise. The removal has no merit and the article has originally included it before an IP adress removed it. Best regards, SigillumVert (talk) 02:25, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hong Kong being a part of China is recognised by multiple WP:RS so I think that user insisting on deliberately excluding it from the scope of this and other articles does fall under vandalism, or at the very least it fails WP:VERIFIABILTY. SigillumVert (talk) 02:30, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Philippine-related articles
- Mid-importance Philippine-related articles
- WikiProject Philippines articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles
- Low-importance China-related articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Stub-Class Ethnic groups articles
- Unknown-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles