Jump to content

User talk:Tolly4bolly/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7→Archive 10

Bryan Kanu

You marked this article for speedy deletion under the A7 criteria within three minutes of it being created. By the time I had look at the article an hour later, it had been expanded such that in my view it does not meet the strict and narrow criteria of an A7 CSD, so I have removed the tag and replaced it with a more lenient {{blp prod}} tag which allows ten days' grace for the article's creator to find references. You might be interested in the archive of the Newbie treatment at Criteria for speedy deletion project that ran a few years back. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:42, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter

Delivered 00:55, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

Seven days after the close of voting, the results of the recent Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) elections have been announced by two of the four stewards overseeing the election, Mardetanha and Pundit. Of the 21 candidates, 13 managed to gain positive support-to-oppose ratios, and the top eight will be appointed to two-year terms on the committee by Jimbo Wales, exercising one of his traditional responsibilities.
In the past year, we've tried to expand our horizons by looking at how WikiProjects work in other languages of Wikipedia. Following in the footsteps of our previously interviewed Czech and French projects, we visited the German Wikipedia to explore WikiProjekt Computerspiel (WikiProject Computer Games). The project dates back to November 2004 and has become the back-end of the Computer Games Portal, which covers all video games regardless of platform. Editors writing about computer games at the German Wikipedia deal with unique cultural and legal challenges, ranging from a lack of fair use precedents to the limited availability of games deemed harmful for youths to strong standards for the inclusion of material on the German Wikipedia.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include ...
This week's big story on the English Wikipedia is obviously the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting (which, by the time you read this, may be renamed 2012 Connecticut school shooting). Quickly created and nominated for deletion not once but twice, and both times speedily kept, the article saw the expected flurry of edits (a look at the history suggests an average of at least one a minute over the first day and a half) and more than half a million page views on the first full day.
Four articles, three lists, and five images were promoted to 'featured' status on the English Wikipedia this week, including a picture of a three-week old donkey (also known as an 'ass').
MediaWiki users (including Wikimedians) can now organise themselves into groups, receiving recognition and support-in-kind from the Wikimedia Foundation. The project, backed by new Wikimedia technical contributor coordinator Quim Gil, has seen five proposals lodged in its first week of operation. The idea of MediaWiki groups mimics that of Wikimedia User Groups.

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

As part of its new focus on core responsibilities, the Wikimedia Foundation is reforming its grant schemes so that they are more accessible to individual volunteers. The community is invited to look at proposals for a new scheme—for now called Individual engagement grants (IEGs)—which is due to kick off on January 15. On Meta, the community is once again debating the two new offline participation models—user groups (open membership groups designed to be easy to form) and thematic organizations (incorporated non-profits representing the Wikimedia movement and supporting work on a specific theme within or across countries). In a consultation process on Meta that will last until January 15, the community will be discussing WMF proposals for a new guideline on conflicts of interests concerning Wikimedia resources. The draft covers COI issues for both volunteers and organizations across the movement.
This week, we spent some time with WikiProject A Song of Ice and Fire, which focuses on the eponymous series of high fantasy literature, the television series Game of Thrones, and related works by George R. R. Martin. The project was started in July 2006 and has grown to include 11 Good Articles maintained by a small yet enthusiastic band of editors.
Seven articles and two lists were promoted to 'featured' status this week, including List of battlecruisers. The article covers all of the battlecruisers—which were a type of warship similar in size to a battleship but with several defining characteristics—ever planned or constructed. The last British battlecruiser built, HMS Hood, is pictured at right.
Efforts were stepped up this week to sow a feeling of trust between the major parties with an interest in the future of the Toolserver. The tool- and bot-hosting server – more accurately servers – are currently operated by German chapter, Wikimedia Germany, with assistance from the Foundation and numerous volunteers, including long-time system administrator Daniel Baur (more commonly known by his pseudonym DaB). However, those parties have more recently failed to see eye-to-eye on the trajectory for the Toolserver, which is scheduled to be replaced by Wikimedia Labs in late 2013, with increasing concern about the tone of discussions.

Happy New Year!

Wishes For A Happy, Joyous And Prosperous New Year!
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Wishing you a very “Happy NEW YEAR“ filled with peace,joy, prosperity and happiness.I have learned a lot from you.Keep up!---zeeyanketu talk to me 19:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Wish you are very very happy and prosperous New Year, Torreslfchero. :) --smarojit (buzz me) 04:34, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year

File:Happy New Year 2013.jpg Have an enjoyable New Year!
Hello Torreslfchero: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Tito Dutta (talk) 20:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2013}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Re:Happy New Year

File:Happy New Year 2013.jpg Have an enjoyable New Year!
Hello Torreslfchero: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Forgot to put name 05:46, 1 January 2013 (UTC)



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2013}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Page notice

Hello bro,Please tell me how to add page notice to talk page.May i know your name if you don't mind.Thanx---zeeyanketu talk to me 20:22, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

In the impersonal, detached Colosseum that is Wikipedia, people find it much easier to put their thumbs down. As such, many people active in the Wikimedia movement have witnessed a precipitous decline in civil discourse. This is far from a new trend, yet many people would agree that it all seemed somehow worse in 2012.
A recent, poorly researched and poorly written story in the Register highlighted the perceived "cash rich" status of the Wikimedia movement. ... The Telegraph and Daily Dot, among others, have alleged that there are multiple links between the WMF, Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales, and Kazakhstan's government, which is, for all intents and purposes, a one-party non-democratic state.
On 27 December the Wikimedia Foundation announced the conclusion of their ninth annual fundraiser, which attracted more than 1.2 million donors. The appeal reached its goal of US$25 million, even though fundraising banners ran for only nine days.
In the first of two features, the Signpost this week looks back on 2012, a year when developers finally made inroads into three issues that had been put off for far too long (the need for editors to learn wiki-markup, the lack of a proper template language and the centralisation of data) but left all three projects far from finished.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include ...
Brion Vibber has been a Wikipedia editor for nearly 11 years and was the first person officially hired to work for the Wikimedia Foundation. He was instrumental in early development of the MediaWiki software and is now the lead software architect for the foundation's mobile development team.
At the beginning of the year, we began a series of interviews with editors who have worked hard to combat systemic bias through the creation of featured content; although we haven't seen six installments yet, we've also had some delightful interviews with people who write articles on some of our most core topics. Now, as we close the year, I would like to present some of my own musings on the state of featured content—especially as it pertains to systemic bias and core topics.
This week, we're celebrating the New Year from Times Square by interviewing WikiProject New York City. Since December 2004, WikiProject NYC has had the difficult task of maintaining articles about the largest city in the United States, many of which are also among the the most viewed articles on Wikipedia. The project is home to 22 Featured Articles, 7 Featured Lists, 32 pieces of Featured Media, and a lengthy list of Did You Know? entries.
Northeastern University researcher Brian Keegan analyzed the gathering of hundreds of Wikipedians to cover the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in the immediate aftermath of the tragedy. ... A First Monday article reviews several aspects of the Wikipedia participation in the 18 January 2012, protests against SOPA and PIPA legislation in the USA. The paper focuses on the question of legitimacy, looking at how the Wikipedia community arrived at the decision to participate in those protests.

Re: Happy New Year 2013

Happy New Year to you too! Thanks. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 12:46, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Happy new year

I too wish you a very happy and prosperous new year. Have a good day. Raghusri (talk) 09:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sulakshana Pandit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anwar Hussain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello ,whenever you nominate a page for speedy deletion,it automatically updates to your csd page.Is it automatic or there is need to create it.Thanx---zeeyanketu talk to me 20:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year

and thanks for signing my guestbook! AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 20:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you very much for signing my guest book.--Pratyya (Hello!) 11:39, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

Meta is the wiki that has coordinated a wide range of cross-project Wikimedia activities, such as the activities of stewards, the archiving of chapter reports, and WMF trustee elections. The project has long been an out-of-the-way corner for technocratic working groups, unaccountable mandarins, and in-house bureaucratic proceedings. Largely ignored by the editing communities of projects such as Wikipedia and organizations that serve them, Meta has evolved into a huge and relatively disorganized repository, where the few archivists running it also happen to be the main authors of some of its key documents. While Meta is well-designed for supporting the librarians and mandarins who stride along its corridors, visitors tend to find the site impenetrable—or so many people have argued over the past decade. This impenetrability runs counter to Meta's increasingly central role in the Wikimedia movement.
The dawning of a new year offers both a fresh slate and an opportunity to revisit our previous adventures. 2012 marked the fifth anniversary of the WikiProject Report and was the column's most productive year with 52 articles published. In addition to sharing the experiences of Wikipedia's many active projects, we expanded our scope to highlight unique projects from other languages of Wikipedia, and tracked down all of the former editors-in-chief of the Signpost for an introspective interview ... While last year's "Summer Sports Series" may have drawn yawns from some readers, a special report on "Neglected Geography" elicited more comments than any previous issue of the Report. Following in the footsteps of our past three recaps, we'll spend this week looking back at the trials and tribulations of the WikiProjects we encountered in 2012. Where are they now?
The past 12 months have seen a multitude of issues and events in the Wikimedia foundation, the movement at large, and the English Wikipedia. The movement, now in its second decade, is growing apace in its international reach, cultural and linguistic diversity, technical development, and financial complexity; and many factors have combined to produce what has in many ways been the biggest, most dynamic year in the movement's history. Looking back at 2012, we faced a difficult task in doing justice to all of the notable events in a single article; so the Signpost has selected just a few examples from outside the anglosphere, from the English Wikipedia, and from the Wikimedia Foundation, rather than attempting to cover every detail that happened.
Over the past year, 963 pieces of featured content were promoted. The most active of the featured content programs was featured article candidates (FAC), which promoted an average of 31 articles a month. This was followed by featured picture candidates (FPC; 28 a month). Coming in third was featured list candidates (FLC; 20 a month). Featured topic and featured portal candidates remained sluggish, each promoting fewer than 20 items over the year.
Following on from last week's reflections on 2012, this week the Technology report looks ahead to 2013, a year that will almost certainly be dominated by the juggernauts of Wikidata, Lua and the Visual Editor.

Shoaib Khan

FYI: another sock appeared and tried again to hijack this article for our friend Shoaib abad ali khan, so I have semi-protected the article for a time and raised Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khanshoaib2000 as a place to keep track of any more socks if they appear. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:25, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High, while for quality the scale goes from Low Quality: Low to High Quality: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Quality: Medium Brahmanandam   Readership: High Quality: Low Hari (director)
Readership: High Quality: Low Diya (light)   Readership: High Quality: Medium Student of the Year (film)
Readership: High Quality: Low Screen Award for Best Actress   Readership: High Quality: Low Jai Hind College
Readership: High Quality: Low Ayan Mukerji   Merge
Readership: High Quality: Low Meenakshi Dixit   Readership: High Quality: High Goa (film)
Readership: High Quality: Low Shrraddha Pandit   Readership: High Quality: Medium Puli (film)
Readership: High Quality: Low Sridevi Vijaykumar   Readership: High Quality: Low Kulin Brahmin
Readership: High Quality: Low Sankham   Add sources
Readership: High Quality: Low J. V. Somayajulu   Readership: High Quality: Medium Urmila Matondkar
Readership: High Quality: Low Ganesh Janardhanan   Readership: High Quality: Medium Vinnaithaandi Varuvaayaa
Readership: High Quality: Low Phool Aur Kaante   Readership: High Quality: Low Rangpur Riders
Readership: High Quality: Low Sushant Singh   Wikify
Readership: High Quality: Low Ram Jaane   Readership: High Quality: Low Sunil Lulla
Readership: High Quality: Low Narendra Chanchal   Readership: High Quality: Low Jorabs
Readership: High Quality: Low Jagdeep   Readership: Medium Quality: Low F.C. Goudi Athens
Readership: High Quality: Low Mukul Dev   Expand
Readership: High Quality: Low Ranjitha   Readership: High Quality: Medium Indian Idol
Readership: High Quality: Low Thadaiyara Thaakka   Readership: High Quality: Low Rok Sako To Rok Lo
Readership: High Quality: Medium Sneha Ullal   Readership: High Quality: Medium Ladies vs Ricky Bahl

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:36, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Guestbook

Thank you for signing my guestbook! ;) CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 08:18, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pokkiri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pranitha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

After six years without creating a new class of content projects, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) has finally expanded into a new area: travel. Wikivoyage was formally launched—though without a traditional ship's christening—on 15 January, having started as a beta trial on 10 November. Wikivoyage has been taken under the WMF's umbrella on the argument that information resources that help with travel are educational and therefore within the scope of the foundation's mission.g
On January 16, voting for the first round of the 2012 Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year contest will begin. Wikimedia editors with 75 edits or one project are eligible to vote to select their favorite image featured in 2012. ... On January 15, the foundation launched its latest grant scheme, called Individual Engagement Grants (IEG).
This week, we set off for the final frontier with WikiProject Astronomy. The project was started in August 2006 using the now-defunct WikiProject Space as inspiration. WikiProject Astronomy is home to 101 pieces of Featured material and 148 Good Articles maintained by a band of 186 members. The project maintains a portal, works on an assortment of vital astronomy articles, and provides resources for editors adding or requesting astronomy images.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include...
Comforting those grieving after the loss of a loved one is an impossible task. How then, can an entire community be comforted? The Internet struggled to answer that question this week after the suicide of Aaron Swartz, a celebrated free-culture activist, programmer, and Wikipedian at the age of 26.
Continuing our recap of the featured content promoted in 2012, this week the Signpost interviewed three editors, asking them about featured articles which stuck out in their minds. Two, Ian Rose and Graham Colm, are current featured article candidates (FAC) delegates, while Brian Boulton is an active featured article writer and reviewer.
The opening of the Doncram case marks the end of almost 6 months without any open cases, the longest in the history of the Committee.
The Wikidata client extension was successfully deployed to the Hungarian Wikipedia on 14 January, its team reports. The interwiki language links can now come from wikidata.org, though "manual" interwiki links remain functional, overriding those from the central repository.

Translation request

Hi Torreslfchero, is it possible for you to translate this page to any other languages you can? ●Mehran Debate● 16:07, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for reply, could you please introduce me someone who can help me with this issue? ●Mehran Debate● 19:17, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much ●Mehran Debate● 16:02, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks, I enjoyed that. Just pure chance that it popped up while I was having a spam-bashing frenzy (: Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gautama Buddha (film)

Just in case you'd like to revisit the discussion... since you commented, sources have been found and the article has been undergoing improvement.[1] Yes, more to do. Cheers, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:09, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for revisiting. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:46, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

The English Wikipedia's requests for adminship (RfA) process has entered another cycle of proposed reforms. Over the last three weeks, various proposals, ranging from as large as a transition to a representative democracy to as small as a required edit count and service length, have been debated on the RfA talk page. The total number of new administrators for 2012 was just 28, barely more than half of 2011's total and less than a quarter of 2009's total. The total number of unsuccessful RfAs has fallen as well. These declining numbers, which were described in what would now be considered a successful year (2010) as an emerging "wikigeneration gulf", have been coupled with a sharp decline in the number of active administrators since February 2008 (1,021), reaching a low of 653 in November 2012.
This week, we spent some time with WikiProject Linguistics. Started in January 2004, the project has grown to include 7 Featured Articles, 4 Featured Lists, 2 A-class Articles, and 15 Good Articles maintained by 43 members. The project's members keep an eye on several watchlists, maintain the linguistics category, and continue to build a collection of Did You Know? entries. The project is home to six task forces and works with WikiProject Languages and WikiProject Writing Systems.
This week, the Signpost's featured content section continues its recap of 2012 by looking at featured topics. We interviewed Grapple X and GamerPro64, who are delegates at the featured topic candidates.
The opening of the Doncram case marks the end of almost 6 months without any open cases, the longest in the history of the Committee.
On 22 January, WMF staff and contractors switched incoming, non-cached requests (including edits) to the Foundation's newer data centre in Ashburn, Virginia, making it responsible for handling almost all regular traffic. For the first time since 2004, virtually no traffic will be handled by the WMF's other facility in Tampa, Florida.


A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Good Humor!
Hello Tolly4bolly. You have signed my guestbook! Thank you very much.--Pratyya (Hello!) 18:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Tolly4bolly. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jason Quinn 2.
Message added 14:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Airplaneman ✈ 14:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for clearing it up! Airplaneman ✈ 19:58, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Hello, I'm Guðsþegn. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Cytoplasm because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Guðsþegn (talk) 20:46, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

My bad. Stiki did me wrong. Guðsþegn (talk) 20:54, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Tolly4bolly. You have new messages at Guðsþegn's talk page.
Message added 20:55, 29 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Guðsþegn (talk) 20:55, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

On New Year's Day, the Daily Dot reported that a "massive Wikipedia hoax" had been exposed after more than five years. The article on the Bicholim conflict had been listed as a "Good Article" for the past half-decade, yet turned out to be an ingenious hoax. Created in July 2007 by User:A-b-a-a-a-a-a-a-b-a, the meticulously detailed piece was approved as a GA in October 2007. A subsequent submission for FA was unsuccessful, but failed to discover that the article's key sources were made up. While the User:A-b-a-a-a-a-a-a-b-a account then stopped editing, the hoax remained listed as a Good Article for five years, receiving in the region of 150 to 250 page views a month in 2012. It was finally nominated for deletion on 29 December 2012 by ShelfSkewed—who had discovered the hoax while doing work on Category:Articles with invalid ISBNs—and deleted the same day.
A special issue of the American Behavioral Scientist is devoted to "open collaboration".
When we challenged the masters of WikiProject Chess to an interview, Sjakkalle answered our call. WikiProject Chess dates back to December 2003 and has grown to include 4 Featured Articles and 15 Good Articles maintained by over 100 members. The project typically operates independently of other WikiProjects, although the project would theoretically be a child of WikiProject Board and Table Games (interviewed in 2011). WikiProject Chess provides a collection of resources, seeks missing photographs of chess players, and helps determine ways that Wikipedia's coverage of chess can be expanded.
New discussions on the English Wikipedia include...
To many Wikimedians, the Khan Academy would seem like a close cousin: the academy is a non-profit educational website and a development of the massive open online course concept that has delivered over 227 million lessons in 22 different languages. Its mission is to give "a free, world-class education to anyone, anywhere." This complements Wikipedia's stated goal to "imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge", then go and create that world. It should come as no surprise, then, that the highly successful GLAM-Wiki (galleries, libraries, archives, museums) initiative has partnered with the Khan Academy's Smarthistory project to further both its and Wikipedia's goals.
This week, the Signpost featured content section continues its recap of 2012 by looking at featured lists. We interviewed FLC directors Giants2008 and The Rambling Man as well as active reviewer and writer PresN.
The Doncram case has continued into its third week.
As reported in last week's "Technology Report", the WMF's data centre in Ashburn, Virginia took over responsibility for almost all of the remaining functions that had previously been handled by their old facility in Tampa, Florida on 22 January. The Signpost reported then that few problems had arisen since handover. Unfortunately that was not to remain the case, with reports of caching problems (which typically only affect anonymous users) starting to come in.

Template?

Hey that message that you posted about that undid revision, is that a template? it seems interesting to use to let the people know Hybirdd (talk) 20:15, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Tolly4bolly. You have new messages at Hybirdd's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Brain Hinman

Dude. His name is Brain Hinman not Brian i was just trying to help — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.249.90.205 (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Belle Dingle

I only put down one sentence because I would have thought someone with more knowledge of the show or the storyline would expand on it, as there was no information about this storyline over the past month. 94.173.99.52 (talk) 20:05, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Chelsea FC

Hello Torreslfchero I suggest that you check out this link http://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/3062188/title/squads-submitted# and I don't edit much so would you mind editing whatever for me, and please tell me if I am wrong Thanks. 74.209.48.100 (talk) 22:42, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Didn't appear constructive to you?

I undid a nonsensical edit to the Asterisk article, and you redid it. Could you maybe be a little more specific as to why my fix... "didn't appear constructive" to you? LieAfterLie (talk) 11:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
C'mon, stop beating me to reverting vandalism with the speed of ClueBot NG. :P Arctic Kangaroo 14:24, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Akatsuki Iikubo

Bonjour, Je pense que vous avez fait une erreur en remmetant le contenue de Akatsuki Iikubo. Ne voulant pas étre sur Wikipédia, serait-il possible d'éffacer cette page ? Merci. Cordialement, Akanaru (talk) 16:39, 2 February 2013

Merci de votre compréhension. Mais aurait il un moyen d'éffacer directement cette biographie ? Etant nouvelle je ne sais pas vraiment me servir de wikipédia. Merci beaucoup. Akanaru (talk) 16:46, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For beating me to vandalism clean-up on Saint Valentine's Day! — Forgot to put name (talk) 19:00, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for protecting my talk page. Way2veers (talk) 21:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Barney the dog

Hello Torreslfchero

My change was entirely constructive. Describing a dog's "battle" with lymphoma is anthropomorphic - and not encyclopaedic.

I think the change should stand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.170.234.62 (talk) 22:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I concede. the dog "battled" with lymphoma after all. Ridiculous lazy journalese. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.170.234.62 (talk) 23:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar, didn't think you'd want that visible on your page. Not long finished clearing up the editors mess!--5 albert square (talk) 22:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Film director

It seems that you and wikipedia have wrong notes on daryush shokof.his records speak for themselves, and you could be simply a transmitter as you are for so many and not judgmental. from the arts to philosophy to films and screenplays, the man has been an established name as an original over 30 years, and you keep nullifying all documents proposed to you about his works that are internationally documented by several writers. this has become very suspicious to many as even the very articles mentioned by your editors as "citation needed" have all long been established and presented to wikipedia Douglas Donegani — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.220.67.32 (talk) 11:14, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

User:Ted thai air may be a sockpuppet

Thai Airways International keeps getting attacked and reverted. The IP user and User:Ted thai air may be operated by the same person. Should we report? BlueRoll18 12:12, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

graham lear article

I updated my bio because the former was outdated and contributed to by people I do not know. This is now the correct version personally uploaded by me. Respectfully, please do not edit. Thankyou, Graham Lear 173.238.158.104 (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Final Fight Streetwise

Hi, received a message from you about my edits to this article possibly being a test edit. That isn't true. Every other page I've seen on the game refers to the drug used within as GLOW (not glow or glo), and I was updating the article to reflect that. (Rave, formerly known as 71.181.67.149) —Preceding undated comment added 06:27, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Reversion

Explain to me exactly how adding content to a community page is unconstructive and may possibly be considered vandalism? The original page is poorly written, contains almost zero content, and was clearly written by a child. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.126.142.254 (talk) 16:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

199.126.142.254 (talk) 16:19, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

No, I don't understand. The two headings I edited (Services and Amenities) both contain content which include no source or citation. Frankly, these are severely lacking in fact and are incredibly vague and ambiguous. I was trying to add content to these areas. How is the "unsourced" content any different than the previously posted unsourced content? 199.126.142.254 (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

User:117.202.91.43

Block this IP already.Harlem Baker Hughes (talk) 18:53, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Covering my back

The Userpage Shield
Thank you for your help! It is good to know that fellow Wikipedians have our backs so that we can contribute to Wickipedia without fear of retaliation! I am One of Many (talk) 20:22, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

you unreviewed a page i edited

you claim my edit was not constructive; I edited a page on the tasmania township of Preston (where I grew up and attended school) the page erroneously informs the reader there is a primary school there which I edited and included the date of closure. please put the information back up as edited the page remains incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.135.147.6 (talk) 13:53, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Bolshevik Singh

The information is doubtful but I am confident. Let it stand until the investigation proves otherwise.

A Bolshevik should not be maligned, when he serves with such Honor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.158.214 (talk) 16:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)


WikiProject Indian Premier League IRC meetup

Hello, Tolly4bolly/Archive 5! WikiProject Indian Premier League is having an informal meetup on Internet Relay Chat channel #wikipedia-en-ipl connect. It scheduled for 9:00 pm IST (3:30 pm UST), 5 July 2012. You are most welcomed to attend.

This notice have been sent to you because you are a member of WikiProject IPL. To discontinue receiving WikiProject IPL notices and newsletters, please add your name here.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tolly4bolly/Archive_5&oldid=1259574862"