User talk:TheSlumPanda/Archive (2) 2025

Happy New Year!

TheSlumPanda,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! Taabii (talk) 07:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Wishing you a happy 2024!

• 
• 
• 

Happy New Year!

• 
  MMXXIV Lunar Calendar

TheSlumPanda,
Have a great 2024 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

---

   – 2024 is a leap year – news article.
   – Background color is Peach Fuzz (#0FFBE98), Pantone's 2024 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2024}} to user talk pages.

– Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaudhary Badan Singh has been accepted

Chaudhary Badan Singh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dcotos (talk) 11:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prasanni Devi Dhillon has been accepted

Prasanni Devi Dhillon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ibjaja055 (talk) 14:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Date and Engvar templates

Hi, it is regarding recent changes like these. Not sure why you've used 'January 2024' as the date, it is January 2025 now and the Narendra Modi article was already updated to September 2024. Secondly, these updations are done using scripts mostly, after taking care of discrepancies related to date format and English spelling in the articles. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Ohh sorry sir thats a big mistake from mine, i am changing it to 2025. And again really sorry sir for my mistake TheSlumPanda (talk) 18:53, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	We may have had some disagreements in past but that does not prevent me from appreciating your exemplary work on Rajasthani articles! - Ratnahastin (talk) 18:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your appreciation and Have a good day! TheSlumPanda (talk) 07:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello TheSlumPanda! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Regarding scripts, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Relist bias

I just came from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murugan Chillayah, where I was the first to propose anything other than simple deletion. I noticed that you relisted the discussion despite two delete !votes (three if you include the nominator) and no opposition. Though my hope is that this particular relist will result in an alternative to deletion, I would caution you to be mindful of relist bias when helping close discussions in the future. Thanks, PrinceTortoise (he/him • poke) 05:58, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello @PrinceTortoise, I relisted that discussion in good faith because only two votes were there and btw thanks for sharing this knowledge on relist bias. Happy editing TheSlumPanda (talk) 06:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vilas Dangre (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vilas Dangre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:20, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello TheSlumPanda! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Regarding Copyright investigation, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:24, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Your edits at Rajasthani people

Could you please explain why you moved other groups and placed the Jats entry at the top in this edit? I have noticed several instances where it seems like you are pushing a specific POV about the Jat group. In another edit, you did something similar. I have compared the Rajasthani people article before your edits and the current version, and it appears that you are trying to add a Jat-centric perspective. I have seen Ratnahastin warn you about WP:GS/CASTE sanctions, but you are still editing these articles in the same way. Please stop this behavior, or I will have no choice but to report you. – DreamRimmer (talk) 08:09, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi @DreamRimmer, i have made some edits on Rajasthani people article to expand it based on reliable sources and i didn't added anything on rajasthani people article which is false or unsourced. But frankly asking if there is such situation where many castes are listed in an article section then should we write them in alphabetical order rather than being unorderd ?. And 2, 3 days ago i also removed some plagiarised material from this article for which it was tagged copyvio, and from now onwards i am preferring to skip or edit less about castes controversies topics and trying to get more knowledge about caste policies. Thanks TheSlumPanda (talk) 09:05, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

It is clear that you were not just changing the alphabetical order. I have reviewed all your edits, and they seem to push a Jat group POV. If you were just following the alphabetical order, why did the Jats come first, while Brahmin, Bishnoi, Bania, and other groups were listed afterward? I have also noticed similar behavior in other caste-related articles. Please stop this. – DreamRimmer (talk) 09:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

plagiarised material from this article for which it was tagged copyvio - As I explained earlier, the content you removed pre-dates all of the urls you included in the copyvio tag, see WP:MIRROR. I think you should undo your tagging. - Ratnahastin (talk) 14:22, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

@Ratnahastin  Done, then can you remove the copyvio tag ? TheSlumPanda (talk) 16:05, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaudhary Chandrapal Singh has been accepted

Chaudhary Chandrapal Singh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- Ratnahastin (talk) 02:04, 3 February 2025 (UTC)