User talk:TheSlumPanda

Nomination of Electoral history of Hanuman Beniwal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electoral history of Hanuman Beniwal, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electoral history of Hanuman Beniwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Border 2 (film)

Hello, TheSlumPanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Border 2 (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: P. Prakash Babu (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Owais Khursheed was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:P. Prakash Babu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 12:24, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheSlumPanda! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 12:24, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chaudhary Dheerpal Singh moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chaudhary Dheerpal Singh. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello TheSlumPanda! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Notability of Politicians in India, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Maharajas of Bharatpur has been accepted

List of Maharajas of Bharatpur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 10:18, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kanjarbhat has been accepted

Kanjarbhat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 18:06, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TheSlumPanda. Thank you for your work on PBM Hospital. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

A short, focussed article, appropriately referenced for the topic. Thanks for creating it!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 20:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: P. Prakash Babu has been accepted

P. Prakash Babu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vilas Dangre (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs much stronger sourcing, and can't make claims about him actually healing people

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vilas Dangre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 14:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, I'm Charliehdb. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jaat (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Makers of the movie are primary sources and hence unreliable per Wikipedia policies. You need reliable secondary sources that have verified the box office figures by themselves. Charliehdb (talk) 16:18, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are right all these notable sites are showing 100cr mark based on mythri movie makers. Thanks for letting me about unreliability of these primary sources TheSlumPanda (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jaat (2025 film)

Hello, TheSlumPanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jaat (2025 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ranjiv Singh Dalal

Hello, TheSlumPanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ranjiv Singh Dalal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jat Mahasabha

Hello TheSlumPanda, i think its wrong to removing the names of Founders of Jat Mahasabha from the infobox, it was list of Founders, not notables. I ask you to rethink about that. Thank you! Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 11:54, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Durjan Singh Jadon Thanks for your comment. I yesterday removed that names as they appeared unsourced to me. Since then i am researching on this Mahasabha and i will shortly update this whole article including the founder section with properly referenced content. TheSlumPanda (talk) 12:32, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, Thank you. 🦅Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 22:40, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]