User talk:Szchalchsz

Welcome!

Hi Szchalchsz! I noticed your contributions to Friedrich Merz and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 17:28, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Talk:Nikita Khrushchev. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Squawk7700 (talk) 01:53, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I archived the talk page in a perfectly normal way, as hundreds of other people have done on Wikipedia. Szchalchsz (talk) Szchalchsz (talk) 01:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to apologize, I am so sorry I got confused Squawk7700 (talk) 01:56, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine, I was worried I might have actually done something stupid. Szchalchsz (talk) 01:57, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No totally my fault, I guess I’m just to tired Squawk7700 (talk) 02:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine, I'm not so tech-literate so I was pretty certain I'd messed something up. No worries. Szchalchsz (talk) 02:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just to check, you know about the archiving bots on the wiki? And btw. completely contradictory to my message the help page H:ARC actually recommends to cut and paste it. Squawk7700 (talk) 02:08, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thanks. Szchalchsz (talk) 02:10, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should I remove the info template? Squawk7700 (talk) 01:57, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd keep it. Szchalchsz (talk) 01:58, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your page moves for article talk pages

Your moves and redirect etc to article talk pages are improper. Your edits have temporarily wiped out the edit histories for these talk pages. These pages moves are not how article talk pages are archived. You need to read and understand Help:Archiving a talk page before you do any more of these page moves. Please stop. - Shearonink (talk) 02:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is a completely offensive and incorrect suggestion. I have not wiped even a single active discussion. I archived 18-year-old complaints that were making the talk pages absurdly long. Szchalchsz (talk) 02:37, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that I offended you but please look at the editing history for the main article talk page of Talk:Leonid Brezhnev. the page history doesn't exist at the main page anymore, your page move wiped it out. Yes it exists at the Archive page but page moves are not how talk pages are archived. There are established guidelines and procedures to follow when talk pages are archived. I applaud your editing zeal in cleaning up talk pages but complete page moves of article talk pages aren't really proper. - Shearonink (talk) 02:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did the right thing, those pages were filled to the brim with unnecessary discussions, although perhaps the Brezhnev one should have been kept. Szchalchsz (talk) 13:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The edit incorrectly archived the ratings and other headers that belong only on the actual talkpage. That breaks the archive links themselves and leaves incorrect links in a variety of other places as well. There was automatic archiving set up, which you also broke. I am going to undo your move. DMacks (talk) 10:44, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead. Szchalchsz (talk) 13:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do not do it again. At any page. You are creating lots of problems for lots of volunteer editors, and we will not tolerate that behavior. Consider this your final warning. DMacks (talk) 17:16, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Szchalchsz (talk) 17:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to List of serial killers by number of victims. Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 02:16, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Friedrich Merz. Aoidh (talk) 02:30, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:BRD, when your edit is reverted, you must discuss the content on the talk page and get a consensus to reinsert it (WP:BURDEN). More importantly, the content being added is highly contentious and unsourced negative information about a living person, which is a WP:BLP matter: Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—must be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing. Do not reinsert this material, and instead discuss it on the talk page, provide sources on the talk page and get a consensus before making any attempt to reinsert it. Thank you. - Aoidh (talk) 02:33, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is NOTHING defamatory about it! You are telling lies ,what was written was polite, sophisticated and respectful ,and no legal wrongdoing was acknowledged. It is a fact that Mr. Merz has negotiated with regimes at odds with international law ,this is something that can be discovered by looking it up for two seconds ,it is a hard, undeniable fact ... something has to be false to qualify as libel Szchalchsz (talk) 02:35, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Calling an individual a serial killer without sources is a serious WP:BLP violation. It does not matter that you believe your content was polite, sophisticated and respectful, it was contentious unsourced biographical information about a living person and must be removed. If you re-add it, you will be blocked to prevent further disruption. - Aoidh (talk) 02:38, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He is a serial killer in a literary sense ,he has killed more than three people through his nauseous actions ... I removed the PSA from the German articles too , because you are being toxic. I would like to discuss this Outside of Wikipedia ,where I can be More Blunt With The Facts ,if you're ok with it Szchalchsz (talk) 02:40, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I highly suggest you read WP:BLP thoroughly before making further edits discussing any living people in any article, talk page, or elsewhere. Discussing this off of Wikipedia would not make any difference in whether the content is appropriate. - Aoidh (talk) 02:46, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I highly suggest you read the news thoroughly to familiarize yourself with the facts. Herr Merz is currently or on the verge of violating international law. That much is a fact. The edit I made carried with it a citation. That it was corrupted by your system is, if anything, a reflection of the poor editing skills of mankind's enemies.

I would prefer to continue this conversation elsewhere because it is much easier to argue the facts in an environment where I am not hamstrung by constant personal attacks, threats of my account getting deleted or washed, and the inability to use slightly rough language, which for the sake of quoting other people is strictly necessary for this discussion to progress reasonably and fairly. Therefore, I am asking you to continue with this conversation somewhere else. I see that you have your Discord username on your userpage, so I can create a profile and talk to you there, or we can chat through email. Whatever you prefer, Ma'am. Szchalchsz (talk) 02:51, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to contact me about this outside of Wikipedia. I could be completely swayed by whatever you say and it still wouldn't matter, WP:BLP is not dependent on my personal opinion on the subject or anyone else's opinion. Please read Wikipedia's policy on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, I respectfully have nothing else to say on the matter. - Aoidh (talk) 02:56, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have read it. Have you read the news? My PSA was written with the BLP rule in mind. It fits it. The edit works fine. Your opinion does matter, since you are a Wikipedia administrator and leader. Why don't we lighten up the mood and befriend each other, work to understand each other's angle, and collaborate to improve the articles in a way we are not currently doing? Szchalchsz (talk) 03:02, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Erich Honecker

added a link pointing to Depression

Willy Brandt

added a link pointing to Depression

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 16:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]