User talk:Srimant ROSHAN
Chris Bishop
You made a mistake. I included in the sentence the link to the 2023 New Zealand general election which has all the results, including his winning Hutt South. It's even updated on his infobox so I think you're being unnecessarily difficult. Obstructive and not easy for someone new to editing
WikiProject India's Collaborations of the month invites you
[edit]You're specially invited to join the WikiProject India's Collaboration of the month program.
The collaboration will help promote many articles to the good and featured article status, but to do so, we need your help! For further information, see the main page of the collaboration.
Sign up for this collaboration by listing your username under the participants section and regularly participating in the collaboration. If you have already signed, please ignore this message.
You can discuss this newsletter here.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.Sent by Hulged ⟨talk⟩ on behalf of WikiProject India. Thank you!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Ok I have to sign up in this Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021
[edit]
Hello, I'm JimRenge. An edit that you recently made to Karla caves seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JimRenge (talk) 12:00, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
I personally visited the site of Karla Cave and captured this image. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 14:10, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
You can visit and test also. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 17:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
You have to clib the 10th piller and use mobile light to see that painting clearly because it is in darkness. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 17:46, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Political Pensioner
[edit]Hi! Why did you revert the change that was made in Colonial section of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_pensioner . There is no reference. It seems like primary research, not allowed on Wikipedia. I already gave an explanation why that whole text was deleted. Seomelono (talk) 18:34, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
No edit summary was there so I revert it
Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 05:48, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ikshvaku, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nimi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sarvatata you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lil-unique1 -- Lil-unique1 (talk) 19:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Sarvatata you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Sarvatata for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lil-unique1 -- Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Attempted reversal of GA nomination closure
[edit]Srimant ROSHAN, your nomination of Sarvatata to be a Good Article was failed yesterday for a very good reason: the article not only does not meet the criteria for a GA by a wide margin, it is currently barely a Start-class article. (See Wikipedia:Content assessment for the various article class levels and what their quality should be.) The reviewer properly closed your nomination as unsuccessful, and it is inappropriate for you to renominate it at this point, especially given the very minor edits that you made in the past hour. I have restored the Talk:Sarvatata page to reflect that closure. Please do not try to renominate the article at this time; instead, familiarize yourself with the assessment levels and also check out actual Good Articles on similar topics to see what is needed for an article to qualify. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, I am the reviewer who failed this article. Please see Talk:Sarvatata/GA1 for comments and a detailed review as to why it failed. Please note that if you renominate the article again without addressing any of these comments, it will be failed straight away. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 09:25, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarvatata until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
>> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 09:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aja of Kosala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ravi.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Sorry for this edit, I fixed the problem. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 11:09, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Srimant ROSHAN! Your additions to Jambhul Aakhyan have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hiroji Indulkar
[edit]The article Hiroji Indulkar you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hiroji Indulkar for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FormalDude -- FormalDude (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Can you explain why the article failed in the first and the third criteria? Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 10:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello - I'm not the reviewer, but according to the good article criteria, a good article should be well-written and broad in its coverage. Your article seems to be missing a lot about his life and his work. I recommend looking at similar GAs for reference. If you have more questions, feel free to ask in the Teahouse. Good luck! Spinixster (chat!) 01:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hiroji Indulkar
[edit]The article Hiroji Indulkar you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hiroji Indulkar for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hoary -- Hoary (talk) 06:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
[edit]| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
Your GA nomination of Zombivli (2022 film)
[edit]The article Zombivli (2022 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Zombivli (2022 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TompaDompa -- TompaDompa (talk) 14:42, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023
[edit] Hello, I'm Re Packer&Tracker. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Vikramaditya that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 17:27, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- I really sorry for mistake I have made but I want to report about certain Wikipedia users who vendalized the page with information which are not have reliable sources to confirm and they do just not for ones they have hundreds of such edits. But I don't know how to report about this vendalizers. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 04:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- You can report the vandals here WP:AIV and I do agree that the user is not here to build an encyclopedia and Doug blocked them yesterday. (link) But still edit summaries like this (link) are not acceptable. Cheers. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 04:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- I apologize for my mistake. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 06:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- You can report the vandals here WP:AIV and I do agree that the user is not here to build an encyclopedia and Doug blocked them yesterday. (link) But still edit summaries like this (link) are not acceptable. Cheers. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 04:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Do not remove discussion page sections once others have commented
[edit]Hi Srimant ROSHAN. Please do not remove discussion page sections once others have commented, like you did here. Please be advised that continuing to do so may result in loss of editing privileges -Fastily 08:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ok I understand but I want to end that discussion so what I have to do now. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 09:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 10
[edit]An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Nicakṣu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuru.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
March 2024 GAN backlog drive
[edit]| Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
The article Zombivli you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Zombivli for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chaotic Enby -- Chaotic Enby (talk) 10:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
- Ratnahastin (talk) 05:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
| This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
- Ratnahastin (talk) 05:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry! My bad but as you can see in any of the inscription of paramaras of malwa they don't mention or associate themselves with any community rather they only say kshtriya which was common to the ruling family of that time. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 06:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- We go by what the reliable sources say. If reliable sources, especially scholarly ones are saying that Parmaras were Rajputs then we only mention that. - Ratnahastin (talk) 10:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
Mz7 (talk) 00:41, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Page numbers
[edit]While reviewing your contributions for your WP:PERM/PCR request, I noticed that many of your articles have citations to entire books. It would be more helpful to readers if you also provided page numbers so that we can easily go in and check where in the book it discusses the subject at hand. For example, in your article Ashwamedhadatha, ref 1 points to this book which is on archive.org: Political history of ancient India, from the accession of Parikshit to the extinction of the Gupta dynasty; however, it is not clear where in the 380-page book Ashwamedhadatha is mentioned (a search for "Ashwamedhadatha" using the search box yielded no results). For information on how to add page numbers to citations, see Help:References and page numbers. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 00:46, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
The article Zombivli you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Zombivli for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Plifal -- Plifal (talk) 10:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
A barnstar for you! |
| Thank you for being part of the fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia, and being one of the top five most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Your hard work is very much appreciated, please keep it up. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC) |
Indian military history case opened
[edit]The Arbitration Committee has opened an arbitration case titled Indian military history in response to an arbitration enforcement referral. You are receiving this notice because you are a named party to the case and/or offered a statement in the referral proceedings.
Please add your evidence by June 5, 2025, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage.
For a guide to the arbitration process, please see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Long standing
[edit]Means it has been there months, the article is not even (let alone specific content) is not even a month old. Slatersteven (talk) 12:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Operation Sindoor Page
[edit]I appreciate your edits on operation Sindoor Page.
I will join your efforts in a few days. Foodie 377 (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize and $500 into geography and populated place articles. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for India and articles which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Evidence phase of Indian military history extended by three days
[edit]You are receiving this message because you are on the update list for Indian military history. Due to an influx of evidence submissions within 48 hours of the evidence phase closing, which may not allow sufficient time for others to provide supplementary/contextual evidence, the drafters are extending the evidence phase by three days, and will now close at 23:59, 8 June 2025 (UTC). The deadlines for the workshop and proposed decision phases will also be extended by three days to account for this additional time.
For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Arbitration remedy proposed which affects you
[edit]Hi Srimant ROSHAN, in the open Indian military history arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the proposed decision, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Proposed decision. For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 19:43, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
- South Asia (WP:CT/SA) is designated a contentious topic. The topic area is specifically defined as
All pages related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups.
- The contentious topic designations for Sri Lanka (SL) and India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan (IPA) are folded into this new contentious topic.
- The community-authorized general sanctions regarding South Asian social groups (GS/CASTE) are rescinded and folded into this new contentious topic.
- All sanctions previously imposed under SL, IPA, and GS/CASTE remain in force. In place of the original appeals rules for GS/CASTE, they may be modified or appealed under the same terms as Wikipedia:Contentious topics § Appeals and amendments. Users appealing such a legacy sanction should list "GS/CASTE" as the mechanism they were sanctioned under.
- Editors aware of the previous contentious topic or general sanction designations are not automatically presumed to be aware of the expanded scope, but may still be sanctioned within a subtopic of which they were previously considered aware. This does not invalidate any other reason why an editor might be aware of the expanded scope. Administrators are reminded that they may issue logged warnings even to unaware editors.
- Given the broad scope of this contentious topic designation, admins are encouraged to use targeted sanctions, such as topic bans from specific subtopics, before banning an editor from the area entirely.
- The topic of Indian military history is placed under the extended-confirmed restriction.
- WP:GSCASTE is placed under the extended-confirmed restriction.
- Administrators are permitted to preemptively protect articles covered by WP:GSCASTE when there is a reasonable belief that they will be the target of disruption.
- A consensus of admins at WP:AE may extend WP:ECR to subtopics of WP:ARBIPA if such a sanction is necessary to prevent disruption. Such extensions must be of a limited duration, not to exceed one year.
- Uninvolved administrators are encouraged to monitor the articles covered by contentious topic designation in the original India-Pakistan case to ensure compliance. To assist in this, administrators are reminded that:
- Accounts with a clear shared agenda may be blocked if they violate the sockpuppetry policy or any other applicable policy;
- Accounts whose primary purpose is disruption, violating the policy on biographies of living persons, or making personal attacks may be blocked indefinitely;
- There are special provisions in place to deal with editors who violate the BLP policy;
- Administrators may act on clear BLP violations with page protections, blocks, or warnings even if they have edited the article themselves or are otherwise involved;
- The contentious topics procedure permits full and semi-page protections, including use of pending changes where warranted, and – once an editor has become aware of the contentious topic designation – any other appropriate remedy may be issued without further warning.
- Abhishek0831996 (talk · contribs), Ekdalian (talk · contribs), and Extorc (talk · contribs) are admonished for their behavior in the topic of Indian military history and related caste issues.
- AlvaKedak (talk · contribs), Akshaypatill (talk · contribs), Capitals00 (talk · contribs), Koshuri Sultan (talk · contribs), and Shakakarta (talk · contribs) are indefinitely topic banned from Indian military history and the history of castes in India, broadly construed. These restrictions may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of these remedies, and every twelve months thereafter.
- Dympies (talk · contribs) is reminded to avoid breaches, even minor, of their topic ban.
- Administrators are reminded that, when possible, topic bans should only be as broad as necessary to stop disruption. Some possible subtopics related to WP:ARBIPA are:
- Specific time periods in Indian history, such as before or after the establishment of the British Raj or before or after the foundation of the Republic of India
- Human activity in India
- Indian entertainment, generally or in a specific language
- Indian political, ethnic, religious, and caste topics
- Hindu nationalism and opposition thereto
- India–Pakistan relations
- Indian WP:BLPs or biographies
Remedies that refer to WP:GSCASTE apply to social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal
, even though GSCASTE was rescinded and folded into the contentious topic designation of South Asia.
For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:01, 18 July 2025 (UTC)